Re: Accusump - pros & cons
Quote:
|
Re: Accusump - pros & cons
you're not hearing, you're reading and it's very easy, stop replying to my posts but you can't, its the only reason you replied to this thread in the first place
|
Re: Accusump - pros & cons
I don’t run one, I don’t have data on one so I had nothing to add. Period.
I and others don’t appreciate you stomping on a thread with your arrogance. You know exactly what you are doing. It’s just your style however I don’t have to put up with it. Ken, can you add a ( block ) please? |
Re: Accusump - pros & cons
You chose to insert yourself in this thread, NOT to offer your opinion on the pros and cons of using an accusump, but rather to attack me.
Quote:
|
Re: Accusump - pros & cons
I choose not to use an accusump just because I don't want all the lines and fittings with possible leaks. Currently running E/SA 71 Camaro 350/330 combo. Runs 80 to 85 under in bracket mode. Fast cars in my class LS1 GTO's run 1.30+ under. Don't believe an accusump will get me a half second. I'll just stick with 5 quarts in the pan. If I need a 10th I'll drop a quart and ice the intake. But otherwise I'll race the shoe polish.
Tom Flowers 3860 E/SA |
Re: Accusump - pros & cons
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Accusump - pros & cons
Quote:
Also been told that he was booted off the Team Chevelle board as well, seems even Chevelle lovers didn`t want to deal with Mr.Eds horse *****. |
Re: Accusump - pros & cons
Quote:
|
Re: Accusump - pros & cons
I have seen many Copo Camaroes and never noticed an accusump on them. Are they hiding them or just doing something different?
|
Re: Accusump - pros & cons
the fact is the vast majority of stockers do not run an accusump.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.