Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
if pontiac, was bird, imo |
Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
Quote:
So the only possible Pontiac that fits is a 68 Bird RA2, factored to 390hp. I have no basis for that factor other than it makes the car fit. 3300/390=8.46 Any factor less than 390hp will knock the car down into C/SA=8.50 class. Why would the RA2 be factored to 390hp when the RA4 was only factored at 380hp? Hard to explain. So if we have to guess a Pontiac, its either a 68 Bird RA2 factored at 390hp or maybe a RA5? LOL but we're getting desperate here. Or it was a 67 Comet 427/410 and somebody thought it was a Pontiac? |
Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
Quote:
Lets say that was the case. Would someone really build a car for that class @ 8.46? :confused: I don't think so. IMO that looks like someone built a car for the 8.50 class and ran really good and got HP that moved them up a class. Stan PS the RAV was a small displacement engine for Trans AM like the Z28. I don't think enough were built for it to be NHRA legal. |
Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
Quote:
The RA2 did run good though so I couldnt rule that out - an over-factored RA2 that ran good even bumped up to B/SA=8.00. In 1971, Fields' RA2 Bird set the D/S=8.50 record at 11.78 at 119.52 That was a stick car but even make it .2 and 2mph slower for an auto, it's still a winnable combo even up in B/SA=8.00 class of 1969. That's just the only PONTIAC that even might fit. If not, then I'm with oldskool, probably not a Pontiac at all. |
Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
Quote:
(1) What year could the '68 Bird I posted a pic of have run B/SA ? :confused: (2) What year could the '69 "Hatari" Bird have run B/SA ? :confused: Both obviously DID run B/SA, at least 1 year, at least at 1 track, under some sanctioning body. When ? :confused: |
Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
Quote:
8.50 in 1968 8.00 in 1969 7.50 in 1970-71 ???? 1972 8.50 in 1973-up So I'd guess those pictures were either 1968 or 1973-up. But again, I dont KNOW the RA2 "factor" - I had guessed about 375hp prior to this strange Ben Wolf car. That 375hp fits all the other RA2 cars, Fields etc, that I can find. But 375hp wont put Ben Wolf in B/SA=8.00. I'm with you, starting to think the Ben Wolf car just wasnt a Pontiac. An L72 Chevelle300 fits (easily mistaken for a GTO LOL) or an L72 Nova is a perfect fit (easily mistaken for a Firebird LOL). We just dont know WHAT the Ben Wolf B/SA=8.00 car is. |
Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
OK gentlemen, thank you for your efforts- I mark it as ‘Firebird ?’ and leave it at that. Its starting to haunt me! 😆
|
Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
DC - Ive started a fire I need to put out on FB.
Re your 69 Stick results sheet. - It seems the SS/E class for L72 Camaros is just out of whack....when 396 Novas ran in SS/D. So it raises some questions.... Was the SS/C 69 Camaro of Jenkins actually a 396/375.....or even an L72 - The ZL1suggestion has everyone in a froth! 😆 Further - if Olster ran an L72, what class would it have fit? |
Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
"...B/SA=
8.50 in 1968 8.00 in 1969..." That solves the '68 B/SA pic, for me. Dealers usually ran the cars while they were still the current model year. According to my math, using an online calculator, a factor of at least 391hp would have been needed to put a '69 Bird into class B. S0, anything from 391 thru 414 would put it into B. 415 would put it into A, & 390 would put it into C, IF my calculations are correct. So, could it have possibly been 395, 400, 405, or 410, in '69, maybe ? |
Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68
Quote:
Is there a Facebook group where all this excitement is happening? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.