Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
Partner went to KY yesterday to pick up the transmission/convertor...likely to put it in the car this Saturday. Been having doubts about my choice in front brakes...not in the ability to stop the car, rather being able to hold the car in place for burnouts. It just didnt feel right testing outside with the original set-up...even without the system being bedded I had the nagging feeling it just wasnt going to perform up to snuff. I'm going to go ahead and swap calipers and be done with it. http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...psa9b1d216.jpg Got a new hand held weather station... http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps82789099.jpg Plans are to dedicate a laptop and interface the weather station with it. I'll use the laptop as a log book and load some type of software (yet to be determined). |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Rich, you'll be a lot happier with those calipers. -Al
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Calipers swapped/bled...line lock works great now and all of the brakes can hold the car in place while on the two-step (3000rpm) even on the slippery concrete apron out front.
http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps09d38f91.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps344a2b61.jpg Did not tackle the transmission today, but the swap is coming soon. http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...pse33924d1.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...psd8b213e7.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...psf21da41e.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps53bc4b05.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps65e371f9.jpg |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Transmission went in the car today. Did a four wheel scale before we quit for the day and it ended up being just about legal minimum @ 2848 pounds. No fuel in the cell and no preload on the Caltracs.
LF - 778# RF - 830# LR - 627# RR - 613# |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Rich car looks great,that is a autometer shift lite,2 stage or 3 ?
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Rich , what oil pan do you have on the car?
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Ed - It's a stage 3 shift light. The oil pan appears to be stock...we have yet to open the motor.
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
2800 pounds? My drivetrain weighs that much! hehe... Curious to what mods , if any, you had to do to put trans in? Looking forward to hearing how it runs!
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
TNT this Saturday at Bowling Green noon to five pm. With a projected high of only 47 degrees it will be less than ideal, but I have to get this car down the track to check everything out. I figure with me in the car along with a full load of fuel on board it should scale around 3050 pounds. |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
what stall did you go with on the converter
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Thomas Arnett sent the convertor in to be re-worked...I assume he provided the spec's for our car. I know his family run several similar cars.
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Finally broke down and bought a quality generator after all these years. All I can say is wow...only 44 pounds and whisper quiet. :)
http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps95c67b65.jpg Blasted my old t(rusty) trailer Sunday afternoon and sprayed it completely with bedliner coating...no more rusting and painting for me. I should have done this years ago. All new bearings/races/seals installed along with new led lights. :D http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...psf68677f7.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps7e81818a.jpg |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Looks good! Good luck at test and tune... So were you able to use the powerglide/4spd crossmember? I have a 4spd crossmember, so if i ever go with a 200, i will be able to put it right in...
Seeing your trailer kinda makes me wish i didnt have an enclosed(i bought last June)...i miss the thumbs up, when people go by me on the highway... |
Bowling Green PukeFest
Well, things went well until I ventured on the track today. Spent some time on the return road bedding the brakes and checking out the new transmission...if I had stopped right there things would have been peachy.
Made the first pass and the car yanked the wheels about two feet high on the launch. Felt alright going down track, but I could tell something wasnt quiet right overall. When I saw the timeslip I decided to fatten the carb and make another pass. http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps94231608.jpg I planned on making this pass first before trying leaving on the two-step, so I stalled it up to 2800 and was really up on the wheel this time for the tree. When I nailed the throttle all hell broke loose under the car. I've broken my share of rear-ends over the years, but I never heard anything like I heard today...like the driveshaft was coming thru the floorpan. With help the car was pushed backwards back into the staging lanes. I could'nt believe what I was seeing once I crawled under the car. At the hit it had folded the spring perches on the axle tubes like they were cardboard sending the center section pinion/yoke sky high into the floorpan. The most extreme pinion angle I have ever seen haha! Made good use of the trailer winch today thank goodness. On the ride back home my partner and I debated the cause of this disaster, but neither of us could come up with a plausible explanation. Everything was dead-on straight, pinion angle at 4 degrees and the u-bolts were tightened to the point of deflecting the Caltrac brackets. We called a good friend and racer Perry Simpkins and he met us at the shop as we pulled in. Once on the lift Perry picked out the culprit...it was simply a failure of the spring perches themselves. Not enough bracing on the tubes. Long story short...don't assume just because you bought the best parts they are the best parts. I'm probably going to have the housing doctored local instead of dealing with Moser. Had I known these perches were so weak beforehand I could have easily braced them myself from the beginning. Jeebus...work on a car all winter to make one pass. :rolleyes: http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps206cf431.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps7626e460.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps1976e4be.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...psf24443bd.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps2268007a.jpg Oh yeah Brent, you were asking about the trans crossmember. I had to drill thru the center for the cable...the only way the bracket was going to mount to the pan. http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps385bbb77.jpg |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Holy Cow!
First off, I glad that your O.K., that is most important. On my Wagon, I have 2" steel straps welded to the ends of the perch angled back to the axle tube on both ends. |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Dang! Im pretty sure that Moser would be getting a call from me, on this deal... THey should make it right. I had them do mine, about 12yrs ago, and ive had no problems...they must be using chinese parts... Now, i will look at mine...I think mine are stronger looking , if i recall...
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
The way it used to look hehe...
http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps52cfe806.jpg One would think that with a failure this quick I can't be the only one this has happened to. Btw, the Moser website really sucks. |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Been there; done that. You will end up with something like this made from square or rectangular tubing and then boxed on the ends.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/LEAF-SPRING-...0994e8&vxp=mtr |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Thanks Dwight...found something better at Calverts. http://www.calvertracing.com/store/h...pair-p-63.html
My question is why Moser did not use something better when they knew beforehand exactly what the intended application was. |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
It was/is pretty common to weld some straps on those perches....but I never saw a failure like that even without them.
You have a ton of work to fix that....pull rear cut off perches....weld on new ones...add strapping....check everything else for damage... If it is legal a strap going over the top of the axle and down to the perch front and back should work. The metal that those perches are made from is questionable in my mind... That's a nice car....I would love to have it....and will be fun to race when you get it fixed.... |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
You are right...a ton of work required for no good reason. Pretty bummed about Moser atm...why use such cheap parts? I'm going to order those Calvert perches and have a local builder do the job. I may be wrong, but my gut feeling tells me Moser would be a long stall in getting any satisfaction and we want to race sometime this season.
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
I would call Moser and give them an opportunity to correct the situation.They should be on the hook for this and fix it asap,saving you some $. If you don't get a warm fuzzy feeling on the phone then you may want to go elsewhere. With social media such as this forum I would hope they view this problem as an opportunity to provide a solution and turn it into a positive for all of us to read about !
The company I work for monitors the web constantly for any such issues and jumps all over them to minimize any damage to it's reputation. |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Rich:
Did you extend the axle housing locator pin through those aluminum spacers and shim? |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
I agree with Tim H. Moser has a good rep for supporting their customers.
You get better results with honey rather than vinegar... They probably buy those perches from a vendor and on a street car they would be fine. On a racecar with a 3 speed with a steep first gear they are not strong enough. Should they know this...well yes they should. Call them. |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Check out Calvets pinion angle shims .
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
For the prior post - The Calvert blocks have their own locating dowels which mesh with succeeding stacks. This was not an issue here as nothing slipped...the flimbsy perches merely collapsed. When I call Moser I will ask if they will repair the housing and replace the perches with Calvert's which I will provide since they obviously don't have a suitable replacement. I'm off to the shop shortly to strip the housing out of the car. |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Didn't Paul Wong have something like this happen to his truck at Stanton last year?
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
I do agree 100%
Drag racing is full of setbacks and some are out of our control. It is a disappointing way to get started. When I have something happen like that it just makes me more determined to fix it right.... I built a new engine last year and had plans to try and race more... I broke the engine.....fixed it...and the same thing happened a second time. I fixed it and replaced what was causing the failures....It pretty much cost me about 2 months worth of racing time not to mention the $$$ It was a very simple issue that led to a major valve train failure. The parts came from one manufacturer and should really have been compatible. I did not pursue it with them as their stated parts warrantee policy was clear. Racing is tough....and always has been... |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
Also how do you get to run a 3 speed with a small block, I always thought 67-68 small blocks were PG only? |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Any Trans is now accepted if it is from the original manufacturer.
So P/G only combos like his can use a 3 speed GM trans of his choice... I think it is a good rule and makes these cars way more fun to race.....and maybe more competitive. With all the other bogus stuff allowed this is minor.... |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps6f1dceac.jpg |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Thanks Alex for the offer, but there was a sudden turn of events this morning.
When my partner showed up this morning I had the housing ready to pull out. One thing led to another and we were headed to town to pick up his torch and welder. Long story short is the perches are repaired, reinforced and the housing is back under the car ready for battle. Plan on being back at Bowling Green this Saturday to pick up where I left off. ;) http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps74b6f4e0.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps5117afe5.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...pscb508288.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps62291a94.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps201dc75f.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps547d3eaf.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps58243e46.jpg http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...psbccf3d9c.jpg |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Tough luck Rich with the Moser perches. We have always braced the original 12 bolt GM perches and never had a problem. There is no question in my mind that the Moser perch is an inferior part. That perch should have not crushed, we used to pull the GM ones loose from the tubes until we braced them, but they never crushed.
Smith Racecraft makes a first class perch designed for racing that you can order for a stock height or 1" lowered built into the perch. They are a nice piece that you may want to check out. |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Pretty sure we are good to go now...there's a bunch of heavy metal under those perches now hehe. Our buddy Perry Simpkins told us today he has the stock multi-leaf perches under his '69 running mono-leaf springs...they must be stouter. If we had not been able to salvage our brackets I probably would have ordered the Calvert's...they look just right. :)
|
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Quote:
http://www.moneymakerracing.net/photos PS. does anypone have a good set of 68 heads,intake and quadrabog they want to sell? and, we'll have a really good set of fast burn heads intake and QFT carb for sale soon |
Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo
Speaking of parts wanted/needed - I'm looking for a extended fuel fitting, 1"x20 8AN for a Edelbrock carb like the one pictured below but have had no luck locating a source. Anyone have a link?
http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps852f8e55.jpg |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.