Mr. Bowtie Bomber, if I was going to pick on you, I could do it in many other ways; and by the way, I never demeaned Mr. Stahl. This article was written long time ago and I am very familiar with it. As a matter of fact, I have tried his programs such as rod angle and others.

From the time the article was written, a lot of new developments have transpired throughout the years; many ideas and perceptions have changed. There is a lot to be learned in the dyno and the track, and not only from a single brand of engine. I have tested and worked on all brands of engines, including imports, and what works with one engine, will not work with another. So, when it comes to rod lengths and ratios, I support the Reher & Morrison statement because I have seen it myself.

So, it is up to you if you want to keep your panties all wadded up.

Nice backstep - you said - "A lot of INCORRECT information in this article." Is that demeaning or disrespectful of Mr. Stahl? Or does it simply show you're willingness to spout off without thinking. There's NOTHING incorrect in his article. So there's YOUR panties wadded up in your toolbox.

I also agree with R&M.

Pro Stock engine rod length says it all eh? ooooh, that nasty side loading issue.




"The less I race the crankier I get..."