Re: Stocker engine choice
 

Dave, I can tell you this. It's going to be a hell of a lot less expensive to get the 350-270 to run 5-7 tenths under than it will that truck motor 454. If you don't believe me call Bruce Parsons because he has experience with both motors.

Re: Stocker engine choice
 

Dave,
You have a PM
Chris

Re: Stocker engine choice
 

So then to move mass you need tq. Then 454 would reason on 60' and at the stipe? Also thanks Chris.

Re: Stocker engine choice
 

Dave,
I'm not saying do one or the other. The 350 is a great combo that has/is run by a huge group of people. The 454 is rare now-a-days. Some people seem to be under the impression that the 454 won't run and that's simply not true. That's all I was trying to get at. Someone said that the 454 is the WORST choice. That's just ignorant.
Mike

Re: Stocker engine choice
 

Again , It was I who said the 454 was the worst combo...IN THAT CAR, IN THOSE CLASSES.... (I should have qualified that statement by mentioning the 400 2bbl as first -worst)

Ignorant? Maybe so, but I stand by my comment.
Then again ,what do I know?

Re: Stocker engine choice
 

Guys,I want to thank you for your input.I did get to speak through email with Bob Bender.Knowing that I do have the option of the 454 I think I will work that combo in time,but I am going to go 350/270. He has proven that combo works. I might have been under estamating the 350.Also, I want to thank Bob for his input,and GOD speed. If any of you are at the Jegs Northern Nats. I'll introduce myself .Dave