Re: 1968 Mercury Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP
Quote:
One of our crowd had a good job as a pipefitter in a manufacturing plant. He bought a new 427/425 Corvette convertible in 66 and was the talk of the town. But three years later he was dating the woman he's still married to and things were looking a bit different. Constant valve adjustments, rough ride, 100 degree summers, and insurance costs seemed to be more important than the thrill of performance. He bought a loaded 69 Caprice 2 dr with a 427, air conditioning, etc. It had gauges, decent gears and every performance option GM would allow on their "luxury" car. I guess you could call it a Caprice SS. But it was still a full size car and there were quite a few like it - Ford 7 Litre, Pontiac 2+2, and Mercury Marauder were mostly the same size and perfomance. Other than the Cutlass SX, which was a combination of 442 and Supreme, I can't think of another smaller car which could give great performance along with comfort. Monte Carlos, Rivieras, Grand Prixs, and Thunderbirds don't count - they were too big and heavy and never got the good engines. Maybe they were just too expensive. I remember a Buick ad for the Riviera calling it "an iron fist in a velvet glove". Shame it never fit the bill and no one produced a gentlemans' hot rod like an Aston Martin was at the time. |
Re: 1968 Mercury Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP
Detroit News (December 1967)
1968 Mercury GT-E 427/390 HP Not built as a 'drag strip racer'. Designed for the 'sports car enthusiast', with raw Ford 427 Power. A well-equipped and stylish sports car, that comes complete with all the 'bells and whistles' of style. A smooth performer, that is designed for open road performance. |
Re: 1968 Mercury Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP
|
Re: 1968 Mercury Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP
Some general specifications,,,,
* Car Weight #3616 lbs. * 123 lbs. of added 'Sound Deadener' * The 427 engine weighed in at a heavy 675 lbs. * Expensive to build * Regular 390 GT Exhaust manifolds * Single-point distributor * Simulated hood scoops * Nose-heavy car (Bumper, Hide-Away Light Assembly, Die-Cast Hood) * Camshaft (Hydraulic) .481/.490 lift - 270*/290* Duration - 46* Overlap * Rating = 390 HP @ 5600 RPM * Torque = 460 Foot/Pounds @ 3200 RPM Performance complaint. The car wouldn't rev near the numbers the factory stated. The valves started to float at 4600 RPM's. Recommendation (For Street Applications) * 3.91 Traction-lock gears (at a minimum) * TRW .515 Lift - 300* Duration (Hydraulic Camshaft) * Higher-rate valve springs * Adjustable rocker arms |
Re: 1968 Mercury Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP
Not to mention the 600cfm Holley. The CJ GTE's ran circles around them in a lower class!
|
Re: 1968 Mercury Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP
Ford #C8AF-AD.......Model #4150.....List #4088.....600 CFM
Specific for the 1968 Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP (Automatic Transmission) http://images.cougarpartscatalog.com...AF-9510-AD.jpg |
Re: 1968 Mercury Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP
From the factory,,,,,,
Ran 15.10 @ 93 MPH But, 'GT Performance' out of Frankfort, Kentucky ran one in C/SA in 1968, and was able to get their car into the 12.70's @ 111 MPH. I'll see if I can find what they did to the car. |
Re: 1968 Mercury Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP
3 Attachment(s)
Here are some pics of one I saw at a car show in Vancouver, WA back in 2009.
|
Re: 1968 Mercury Cougar GT-E 427/390 HP
The 1968 427/390 HP really got 'trashed' by the critics, as 'too expensive' and a 'non-performer'.
http://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/1/1/9...14987219_o.jpg |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.