The Best HP Rated Car.
With all the HP changes today, its hard to keep up.
What was the Best HP rated car of yester-year. In other words, was low-rated by the factory and snuck in under the NHRA radar. * Chevrolet 1967-1969 (Camaro's & Nova's) 396/375HP PC |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
1974 ford 460 @ 170hp
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
I think the most underrated engine is the 350 in the 1977 or 1978 Cadilac. It's factored at 188hp! |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
1. The 1957 Chevrolet 283" 270 hp dual quad combo....
2. The 1964 and up Chevelle 283" 220 hp combo, and the 327" 250 hp combo....all still capable of winning today.... opinion only. WJ |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
For years the 307 Olds in its many iterations, but now, anything the two Bob's are running! Also possibly the 265 Chev taxi motor
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
LS1 with a stick
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
I'll go way back.
1962 Dodge/Plymouth 361/305HP Pretty dominant from 62' thru 67'. And of course the early 69' Chevy 350/255HP LM1 engine in the Camaro's and Nova's. PC |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
nhra rated at 300 not the factory
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
1974 factory rated was 190hp
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
Put the flat hood on and its 20 less than the automatic. In the Camaro its 24 less than the automatic In a Corvette is 33 less than the Camaro. |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
There are some good 350's out there but the 255 rated @ 280 is not one... It's fair at best ! |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
If you want the best HP rated car contact Bob Shaw. I'm sure he could put together some combo that would do the trick.
Ron Ortiz U/SA not the best combo |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
He might be looking for "ancient" combos like the blown 312 Fords, etc. Overall though, I'd say it would have to the GM 1993 LT1 ,which is now + 71 HP over what it entered the books at. |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
I would value the opinions of the four "gurus" of Stock - Mark Yac, Neil Smedley, Bob Shaw and Billy Nees. We've heard from Mark. I await hearing from the others. I know this much, my combo is definitely NOT the best - '86 305 165/249.
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
I'm still trying to understand the question! :confused:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
what ever combo bob dennis was running yesteryear aka still :-x
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Mark and Dwight,
Thank You, You understood what I meant, when I said 'yesteryear'. Ken, I did not mean todays re-factored HP ratings. Your correct though, the 350/255 LM1 engine at 280HP (todays NHRA HP rating) is what it should have been. Those early 1969 350/255HP LM1 engines (in the Camaro's and Nova's (12.00-12.49 wt/hp) and Chevelle's (12.50-12.99 wt/hp), did a number on everyone in J/S, K/S and L/S as well as SS/M and SS/N back-in-the-day 69' thru 73'. They might not have won all the major events back then, but at local tracks those engine combo's in those cars were always in the "Top" of Stock Eliminator. Looking back, for stock class that 255HP was way low by yesterdays standards. Properly rated at 275 or 280 horsepower, those 69' Camaro's and Nova's would still have been competitive in the 11.00-11.49 wth/hp bracket, (ie; H/S in 69' and I/S in 70'/71'). If you take a peak at the NHRA blueprint specs, you can see that the 350/255HP engine is closer to the 350/300HP engine specs than the 327/250HP engine specs (which it replaced as Chevrolet's base 4-barrel engine). A 275HP to 285HP rating is more in line. PC |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
CC'd,
The major difference between the 1969 #LM1 350/255HP engine and the #L48 350/300HP is the compression. 10.25-1 for the 300HP and 9.00-1 for the 255HP. The 300HP had a 4-bolt main block, and the 255HP had a 2-bolt main. The Rochester #203 carburetor (750cfm) and #184 spread-bore cast iron intake are the same. The hydraulic camshafts .390/.410 lift and 258/269 duration, and valve train components are the same. The cylinder head valves,1.94 intake and 1.50 exhaust valves are the same, but the #L48 350/300HP utilized #041 castings with (63 cc chambers), and the 255HP utilized #441 castings with (76 cc chambers). Both used flat top pistons with notches. The #LM1 engine could be ordered in a non-SS car only, the #L48 engine was a SS Package only. WHEW!! CC, Come to think of it, your right. There were alot more guys running the 69' 350/255HP Camaro's with success in 69' thru 73', than the 69' Camaro SS350/300HP. The 69' SS Camaro's got clobbered in G/S and G/SA (10.00-10.49 wt/hp). A sneaky class, 69' Camaro 350/255HP convertible automatic in L/SA (70'/71') and/or (SS/NA 1972, National record 12.26; see John Lingenfelter) |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
And just for the record, the 350/255 Camaro was ONLY available with a FLAT hood!
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Don he was only being facitious.
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Can I have a cowl hood also ? PLEASE
From what I have been told the Nova should have 5 hp LESS . Because the Camaro has the cowl hood.. |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
As a personal note, I coached a friend of mine in optioning a 1969 Camaro he ordered. He was attending college at the time and was receiving some money from his dad who required "no hot rod". He ordered a base Camaro with an F41 suspension, 350-255, four speed, positraction, spoilers, ZL2 hood, disc brakes, HD rear axle, custom interior and several other comfort features. Nice car. Not too fast, but one that many would covet today. |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
MY question was just answered. Think you could run one on a 2nnl 350? Or could you get away with it?
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
I don't think there is any documentation to support anything less than a 350/300 in a Pace Camaro. I once had one and did a lot of research on them.
Mine was a 350 /T350 w/ A/C. Goes down as one of those I should have kept! :( |
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Dwight, I wasn't thinking of the Z-28 cars. Part of the Pace Car package was the SS (Z-29) option and the base engine was a 350/300. As far as your friends car if you say it's so then I won't argue the issue with you as I've had a few really oddly optioned Camaros myself.
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Quote:
|
Re: The Best HP Rated Car.
Cowl-Schmowl,
I think you could get a ZL-2 cowl hood on a 6-cylinder too, late in the production year (Maybe January). Good for 5 more HP, if you were going backwards:p Dwight I think that LM-1 package also came through with a 12-bolt 3.31 posi, and multi-leaf rear springs as standard. I think the 4-speed M20 wide-ratio Muncie was an option, wasn't it? The F41 suspension package, as you said, was optional on the LM1, but standard on the SS package. I think too, the LM1 had a smaller exhaust system, while the SS 350/300HP had the bigger pipe N10 dual exhaust. PC Hey Don Whitmore, I had an 80' Z-28 (bought brand new). I'm Italian, so I had to get a "GUIDO" car. Yes, white with blue Z-28 striping, and of course T-Tops (Yes, they leaked!) I smartly ordered it with the better 350/190HP 4-barrel engine option (instead of the "DOG" 305/155HP). Radio delete and no a/c. Your right, nothing special at all on the street. Not the greatest engine either. I babied it, and it still wiped the camshaft after 20,000 miles. The heads cracked at 30,000 miles. The pistons and rings were shot at 40,000 miles. Not Chevrolet's finest moment. PCII |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.