CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock Tech (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   H/P to weight question (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=62554)

my69396 06-15-2016 03:00 PM

H/P to weight question
 
Is there a formula for weight to horsepower? How much h/p would a 283 have to make to run high 12s in a 3300 lb car?

Mike Pearson 06-15-2016 04:03 PM

Re: H/P to weight question
 
If you plug those numbers into the Wallace power speed calculator you will need about 320 HP to run 12.80 at that weight.

ALMACK 06-15-2016 05:45 PM

Re: H/P to weight question
 
http://www.wallaceracing.com/et-hp-mph.php


Scroll down and pick you formula

ALMACK 06-15-2016 05:55 PM

Re: H/P to weight question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by my69396 (Post 506632)
Is there a formula for weight to horsepower? How much h/p would a 283 have to make to run high 12s in a 3300 lb car?

12.90 @ 3300 lbs = 304 hp
Not sure if that is 304 rear wheel or flywheel hp

Ed Wright 06-15-2016 06:01 PM

Re: H/P to weight question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ALMACK (Post 506649)
12.90 @ 3300 lbs = 304 hp
Not sure if that is 304 rear wheel or flywheel hp

304 at the tires will easily run 12.90 in a 3300 lb car.

pfordamx 06-23-2016 09:23 AM

Re: H/P to weight question
 
i'm curious if this is wheel or flywheel hp too, and my other curiosity is if your mph show significantly less hp than e.t. at the same weight does that just mean you have a efficient car?

DeuceCoupe 06-24-2016 11:06 AM

Re: H/P to weight question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pfordamx (Post 507277)
i'm curious if this is wheel or flywheel hp too, and my other curiosity is if your mph show significantly less hp than e.t. at the same weight does that just mean you have a efficient car?


It looks like the Wallace link uses NET flywheel power. Then they make assumptions to translate that to rear wheel power which is what move the car. Note they say the formula is just approximate, eg they don't even ask what transmission you have.


If MPH is low it can mean a bunch of stuff
1. Running out of fuel on top (common in my old junk)
2. Running out of revs
3. Brick-like aero or headwind (a 5mph headwind will reduce trap speed about 1mph - varies by car of course)
4. Other


If you have open headers, not too many belt drives, a big air filter, and cold air coming in, NET horsepower will get really close to GROSS horsepower. Still some losses to get to the rear wheels, no way around that.

pfordamx 06-24-2016 11:20 AM

Re: H/P to weight question
 
well a amx isn't the most aerodynamic car i can think off and the ets and mph i was using were from a day when we were driving in to a 20 mph head wind but it was good cool air.

Jim Caughlin 06-24-2016 12:55 PM

Re: H/P to weight question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DeuceCoupe (Post 507391)
It looks like the Wallace link uses NET flywheel power. Then they make assumptions to translate that to rear wheel power which is what move the car. Note they say the formula is just approximate, eg they don't even ask what transmission you have.


If MPH is low it can mean a bunch of stuff
1. Running out of fuel on top (common in my old junk)
2. Running out of revs
3. Brick-like aero or headwind (a 5mph headwind will reduce trap speed about 1mph - varies by car of course)
4. Other


If you have open headers, not too many belt drives, a big air filter, and cold air coming in, NET horsepower will get really close to GROSS horsepower. Still some losses to get to the rear wheels, no way around that.

In a somewhat strange mathematical coincidence, optimal ET x MPH in 1/4 mile tends to equal 1320 (example 10.00 ET x 132 MPH = 1320, 11.00 ET x 120 MPH = 1320) so you can use that number as a baseline. As we know, MPH tells you how much HP you are making, the 1320 number gives you a reasonable idea of how well you are getting it to the ground. Not surprisingly, high HP cars tend to be a little over the 1320 number, low HP cars under but usually not by much.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019

Hans Olsson 06-24-2016 01:22 PM

Re: H/P to weight question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Caughlin (Post 507398)
In a somewhat strange mathematical coincidence, optimal ET x MPH in 1/4 mile tends to equal 1320 (example 10.00 ET x 132 MPH = 1320, 11.00 ET x 120 MPH = 1320) so you can use that number as a baseline. As we know, MPH tells you how much HP you are making, the 1320 number gives you a reasonable idea of how well you are getting it to the ground. Not surprisingly, high HP cars tend to be a little over the 1320 number, low HP cars under but usually not by much.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019

Very good explanation.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.