CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post - Rambler All-American

67RogueX-code · 02-08-2012, 11:33 AM

Paul,

You have stumbled into the "black hole" of AMC documentation.

I am not aware of anyone that has found ANY verifiable documentation regarding the production numbers from the "east" assembly-line (where the Americans were produced) for 1967. The "58" number is generally accepted by the AMC community as accurate, based on the short period of time the X-code cars were produced (January through aproximatelly May of '67).

The list that you found that shows no 220's and 7 convertibles, coincides with a list that has been debunked by the AMC community, for two reasons. First, we currently know of several (verifiable) 220 X-code cars that still exist today, and secondly, because we are fairly confident who those numbers came from.

Several years ago, a person who was very influential in the AMC-community, was basically black-balled for "borrowing" original copies of AMC (corporate) materials, fraudulantly altering that documentation, and presenting it as "new", previously undisclosed information... those exact numbers were ones that this individual claimed as being true.

02-08-2012, 11:33 AM	#7
67RogueX-code Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Sylvania, Ohio Posts: 18 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Rambler All-American Paul, You have stumbled into the "black hole" of AMC documentation. I am not aware of anyone that has found ANY verifiable documentation regarding the production numbers from the "east" assembly-line (where the Americans were produced) for 1967. The "58" number is generally accepted by the AMC community as accurate, based on the short period of time the X-code cars were produced (January through aproximatelly May of '67). The list that you found that shows no 220's and 7 convertibles, coincides with a list that has been debunked by the AMC community, for two reasons. First, we currently know of several (verifiable) 220 X-code cars that still exist today, and secondly, because we are fairly confident who those numbers came from. Several years ago, a person who was very influential in the AMC-community, was basically black-balled for "borrowing" original copies of AMC (corporate) materials, fraudulantly altering that documentation, and presenting it as "new", previously undisclosed information... those exact numbers were ones that this individual claimed as being true. __________________ Bob Wilcox 67RogueX-code