View Single Post
Old 09-08-2018, 04:05 PM   #34
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: 302 Chevrolet Engine Build

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland View Post
Yac-
Leaving “on the mat” back then is not the same level of strain as the sustained 8000+ rpm runs of today’s cars. Secondly, we broke a bunch of rods back then, too! And if you break a rod in an engine today, it’s way too expensive to consider taking a chance.
There were only three small journal rods - early 265, ‘57-‘62 265 & 283, and the ‘63-‘67 283 & 327. There ware no special high performance forgings. The solid lifter ‘65-‘67 engines sometimes got “green” rods which meant they were magnafluxed before they were machined. All these rods are 50+ years old today. Do you want to trust them for a $10K engine?
Head casting numbers changed due to engineering changes that had nothing to do with port design. 462 changed the combustion chambers, 291 made allowance for closed crankshaft ventilation with open slots between the push rods, and 186 had the provisions for bolt holes in the end.
Just a bit of history.

I could not agree more with Dwight......Seen way to many stock rods break and you will destroy the engine if one fails....No maybe about it...

You just don't see stockers blowing up much anymore and its not because they really prepped their stock rods....Its because they aren't using them.....along with all the other parts that routinely broke...
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked