Re: Was it just me?
I missed this thread at first,but I'm glad I read it. .......I video all my runs, so I know what the variance on frame count for the reaction times is for my camera. .....At the Atco points race I tested on Thursday,making 6 passes . ...Five were between .011 and .018 all at the same frame count, one was a .080! at the same frame count.........I initially wrote it off as a fluke untill I had a .079 light at the same frame count ,in the same lane ,at the same time of day! ............I know I heard several other racers with similar r.t's at the same time of day......... On Saturday after a .015 lite during time trials, I felt confident staying in the same lane, again I got bit by a .069 light.........The common factors on all the runs were that the sun was on that side of the track, and all the runs were within five minuits of the same time of day, 5 pm.............At this point, I suspect that a weak infared sensor can react to the low sun angle, similar to the shine back problem we had when we had photocells....... Jeff, can you comment on this? ... ..Tom
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK
|