CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

Bobby Fazio · 08-31-2014, 10:38 AM

3285lbs with you in the car for N/SA. You can't call the car a 1991 because that is rated at 220hp as opposed to the 1987-1989 mustangs that are rated at 215hp. Don't as me why as they are all the same engine. A 1990-1993 (never go with 1991 or 1993) mustang hatchback can't be run in N. The lowest you can go is L or M with those years because of the 220hp rating, 1993 has a bad cc chamber blueprint of 62.7cc as opposed to the other years' 60.6cc. 1991 has a .044" gasket thickness while all other years have .041".

1988 or 1989 is what everyone classifies their EFI stocker stang as.

08-31-2014, 10:38 AM	#6
Bobby Fazio VIP Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ Posts: 1,377 Likes: 1,148 Liked 3,494 Times in 426 Posts	Re: weight (it maybe time for a diet ?) 3285lbs with you in the car for N/SA. You can't call the car a 1991 because that is rated at 220hp as opposed to the 1987-1989 mustangs that are rated at 215hp. Don't as me why as they are all the same engine. A 1990-1993 (never go with 1991 or 1993) mustang hatchback can't be run in N. The lowest you can go is L or M with those years because of the 220hp rating, 1993 has a bad cc chamber blueprint of 62.7cc as opposed to the other years' 60.6cc. 1991 has a .044" gasket thickness while all other years have .041". 1988 or 1989 is what everyone classifies their EFI stocker stang as. __________________ '65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA DriverInterviews.com \| App.DragInsights.com Last edited by Bobby Fazio; 09-01-2014 at 11:24 AM.