|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
With all the HP changes today, its hard to keep up.
What was the Best HP rated car of yester-year. In other words, was low-rated by the factory and snuck in under the NHRA radar. * Chevrolet 1967-1969 (Camaro's & Nova's) 396/375HP PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: wv
Posts: 884
Likes: 42
Liked 56 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
1974 ford 460 @ 170hp
__________________
Vic Guilmino 1129 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Paxton, Massachusetts
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
1. The 1957 Chevrolet 283" 270 hp dual quad combo....
2. The 1964 and up Chevelle 283" 220 hp combo, and the 327" 250 hp combo....all still capable of winning today.... opinion only. WJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 785
Likes: 45
Liked 316 Times in 67 Posts
|
![]()
For years the 307 Olds in its many iterations, but now, anything the two Bob's are running! Also possibly the 265 Chev taxi motor
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 372
Likes: 43
Liked 98 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]()
LS1 with a stick
__________________
Dave Ficacci 1013 STK 1170 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Live Reporter
|
![]()
Dave -- You must be talking about the one that got HP this week and will more than likely get it again at years end .................
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
I assume you are looking for one that hit the classification guide without a factor when it was first introduced. In yesteryear, it would have to be the 350-255. IIRC it was the first engine to receive a hp factor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Mark and Dwight,
Thank You, You understood what I meant, when I said 'yesteryear'. Ken, I did not mean todays re-factored HP ratings. Your correct though, the 350/255 LM1 engine at 280HP (todays NHRA HP rating) is what it should have been. Those early 1969 350/255HP LM1 engines (in the Camaro's and Nova's (12.00-12.49 wt/hp) and Chevelle's (12.50-12.99 wt/hp), did a number on everyone in J/S, K/S and L/S as well as SS/M and SS/N back-in-the-day 69' thru 73'. They might not have won all the major events back then, but at local tracks those engine combo's in those cars were always in the "Top" of Stock Eliminator. Looking back, for stock class that 255HP was way low by yesterdays standards. Properly rated at 275 or 280 horsepower, those 69' Camaro's and Nova's would still have been competitive in the 11.00-11.49 wth/hp bracket, (ie; H/S in 69' and I/S in 70'/71'). If you take a peak at the NHRA blueprint specs, you can see that the 350/255HP engine is closer to the 350/300HP engine specs than the 327/250HP engine specs (which it replaced as Chevrolet's base 4-barrel engine). A 275HP to 285HP rating is more in line. PC Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 07-10-2010 at 10:06 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Benton, Arkansas
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Very good point Dwight. And that was way before the AHFS.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|