Stocker engine choice

Dave Borror · 07-31-2011, 06:19 PM

I'm in the process of building a stocker from a 71 Caprice.This car came with the 400 SB. Natural class would be O/SA. The Since the Caprice came with the 400sb,402bb,and the 454.I like all the choices but the 402. Next question is, the Impala came with the 350 which would give it the Hp break and put it in I believe QorR/SA which puts it with the 95 era 350lt Caprice.which is about .5 difference on the index.and I dont see it running with the fi cars.I dont expect to tear the index but would at least like to be -.5 under.This car has been a very winning bracket car but with a 383 in it.I've race Stock for years back in the 80s and like the odd ball stuff.Give me a little input on which combo you would start with and why.Thanks Dave

greg fulk · 07-31-2011, 08:00 PM

The 350....Natural N add weight to O....the 400 is a 2bbl

Dave Borror · 07-31-2011, 08:34 PM

yea I know just was wondering what you guys thought on which motor and why.

greg fulk · 07-31-2011, 08:53 PM

400 with 2bbl would be a bad deal. I think the 71 350 @ 270 in your car is the lowest rated Hp of any Chevy 350 4bbl. The 487 heads are a pretty good head everything else is normal 350 stuff. I'm not sure on the pistons in that engine though.

Daran Summerton · 07-31-2011, 09:10 PM

Change the tail lights and 350 2 barrel 993 heads - Q/SA
400 is HORRIBLE

Mark Yacavone · 07-31-2011, 09:22 PM

Run it in O with the 350/ 4 bbl . Easier to start there.

08-08-2011, 11:12 AM

Dave,
You have a PM
Chris

Dave Borror · 08-08-2011, 12:04 PM

So then to move mass you need tq. Then 454 would reason on 60' and at the stipe? Also thanks Chris.

MikeFicacci · 08-08-2011, 12:54 PM

Dave,
I'm not saying do one or the other. The 350 is a great combo that has/is run by a huge group of people. The 454 is rare now-a-days. Some people seem to be under the impression that the 454 won't run and that's simply not true. That's all I was trying to get at. Someone said that the 454 is the WORST choice. That's just ignorant.
Mike

Mark Yacavone · 08-08-2011, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeFicacci

Dave,
I'm not saying do one or the other. The 350 is a great combo that has/is run by a huge group of people. The 454 is rare now-a-days. Some people seem to be under the impression that the 454 won't run and that's simply not true. That's all I was trying to get at. Someone said that the 454 is the WORST choice. That's just ignorant.
Mike

Again , It was I who said the 454 was the worst combo...IN THAT CAR, IN THOSE CLASSES.... (I should have qualified that statement by mentioning the 400 2bbl as first -worst)

Ignorant? Maybe so, but I stand by my comment.
Then again ,what do I know?

07-31-2011, 06:19 PM	#1
Dave Borror Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Hide Away Hills Ohio Posts: 24 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Stocker engine choice I'm in the process of building a stocker from a 71 Caprice.This car came with the 400 SB. Natural class would be O/SA. The Since the Caprice came with the 400sb,402bb,and the 454.I like all the choices but the 402. Next question is, the Impala came with the 350 which would give it the Hp break and put it in I believe QorR/SA which puts it with the 95 era 350lt Caprice.which is about .5 difference on the index.and I dont see it running with the fi cars.I dont expect to tear the index but would at least like to be -.5 under.This car has been a very winning bracket car but with a 383 in it.I've race Stock for years back in the 80s and like the odd ball stuff.Give me a little input on which combo you would start with and why.Thanks Dave

07-31-2011, 08:00 PM	#2
greg fulk VIP Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: jackson Posts: 1,165 Likes: 0 Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts	Re: Stocker engine choice The 350....Natural N add weight to O....the 400 is a 2bbl __________________ Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN"

07-31-2011, 08:34 PM	#3
Dave Borror Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Hide Away Hills Ohio Posts: 24 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Stocker engine choice yea I know just was wondering what you guys thought on which motor and why.

07-31-2011, 08:53 PM	#4
greg fulk VIP Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: jackson Posts: 1,165 Likes: 0 Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts	Re: Stocker engine choice 400 with 2bbl would be a bad deal. I think the 71 350 @ 270 in your car is the lowest rated Hp of any Chevy 350 4bbl. The 487 heads are a pretty good head everything else is normal 350 stuff. I'm not sure on the pistons in that engine though. __________________ Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN"

07-31-2011, 09:10 PM	#5
Daran Summerton Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Las Vegas nv Posts: 600 Likes: 18 Liked 66 Times in 37 Posts	Re: Stocker engine choice Change the tail lights and 350 2 barrel 993 heads - Q/SA 400 is HORRIBLE __________________ 72 cutlass

07-31-2011, 09:22 PM	#6
Mark Yacavone Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Miles From Nowhere Posts: 7,790 Likes: 2,881 Liked 5,080 Times in 1,936 Posts	Re: Stocker engine choice Run it in O with the 350/ 4 bbl . Easier to start there. __________________ "We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers

08-08-2011, 11:12 AM	#7
Chris Hardy Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Stocker engine choice Dave, You have a PM Chris

08-08-2011, 12:04 PM	#8
Dave Borror Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Hide Away Hills Ohio Posts: 24 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Stocker engine choice So then to move mass you need tq. Then 454 would reason on 60' and at the stipe? Also thanks Chris.

08-08-2011, 12:54 PM	#9
MikeFicacci Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 241 Likes: 1 Liked 14 Times in 1 Post	Re: Stocker engine choice Dave, I'm not saying do one or the other. The 350 is a great combo that has/is run by a huge group of people. The 454 is rare now-a-days. Some people seem to be under the impression that the 454 won't run and that's simply not true. That's all I was trying to get at. Someone said that the 454 is the WORST choice. That's just ignorant. Mike __________________ Mike Ficacci Stk 1010