|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
Some years ago 3rd gen Camaros and Firebirds were built with short upper four-link bars. Ed Quay and others offered frame rails and other hardware to product those builds.
Question; is there any downside to the short upper bar? Does that design react/operate the same as an equal length four link? If would be for a small block powered package with an ET range of 9.50's
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,561
Liked 1,788 Times in 408 Posts
|
![]()
They tend to be on the violent side when used with a manual transmission or a transbrake, and a bit less friendly to tune. Footbrake cars that don't have a ton of torque or a lot of gear seem to work well.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
Ed Quay built my Monte back in 85 with short upper bars. After a lot of playing with it then having a chance to play with equal 4 link bar car I found that any changes to short upper bar seemed like drastic large swings even though you moved 1 hole or changed ride height. The equal bar car when making the same changed seemed more tune able. The Monte worked well but maybe I didn't have enough knowledge back then to figure out little changes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 679
Liked 1,019 Times in 367 Posts
|
![]()
We eventually had Kronenbitter cut out our short bar and converted it to long bar. Like the other guys said, short bars are touchy. For a bracket car that never changes anything,they would be dandy. Really no problem hooking them. But changes in ride height along with changes in tire diameter, makes a perfect acting car act stupid. You cant throw 150 lbs ( sometimes more), in and out of them, and not have issues....
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Larry,
The bars on my car are: Top - 20" C-C Bottom 22: C-C The 4 link bracket on the rear end has an 8 deg forward tilt off of vertical for the top mount. You will probably have better luck with that than just a vertical on center rear end bracket. My car liked it even though it shortened the top bar. Call me if you want the mount distance off the C/L of the housing and bar angles.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 212
Likes: 42
Liked 286 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]()
Larry,
Trying to figure out how to adjust our suspension, we found this spreadsheet on the Internet which helped us understand why our car was reacting as it did. It answered a lot of our questions and allowed us to get our car to work pretty good. This same information is available in some of the chassis setup books available. http://www.patooyee.com/calculators/4BarLinkV3.0c.xls
__________________
Larry Merk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|