|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Liked 124 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 1,172
Liked 660 Times in 283 Posts
|
![]()
Very Cool
Video explains trans brake operation... legal for Stock? MJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Liked 124 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dela-where?
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 1,023
Liked 1,689 Times in 537 Posts
|
![]()
Launch Assist – uses wheel speed sensors to watch for driveline-damaging wheel hop at launch and, in milliseconds, modifies the engine torque to regain full grip
Would this be legal ????? Different words but let’s call it what it is, traction control! this opens up a whole new can of worms
__________________
KEITH MAYERS 2 X somebody many X nobody Last edited by Keith 944; 04-16-2019 at 03:32 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: cincinnati ohio
Posts: 206
Likes: 196
Liked 190 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Funny how the press release brags about 485 hp.yet is only rated 390 by NHRA. Same ***** different day. Rick ps I wonder if they would give 20% off my combo? not !!!
__________________
Rick Winchester Stk 3277 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 53
Likes: 62
Liked 112 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]()
Agree, just like the ultra bogus 360 HP the 2015 Camaro started with as opposed to its 425 HP factory rating. Happy to see the new cars competing in Stock, but do the guys in legacy cars always have to get it in the A** for a couple of years before the AHFS catchs up with the new combinations? Why not start with the factory HP ratings and then let the AHFS level the playing field?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Calabasas Ca
Posts: 138
Likes: 3
Liked 53 Times in 20 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: malden,ma
Posts: 228
Likes: 231
Liked 81 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]()
don't care what brand you like, that's cool
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,318
Likes: 1,675
Liked 9,562 Times in 1,988 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Dave. Please keep it up!
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 849
Likes: 1
Liked 471 Times in 114 Posts
|
![]()
Always good to see cars put in the guide.
I think it could possibly be a interesting bracket car, with a warranty, and might lead new blood into the stock and superstock arena. Especially if Ford and GM, put out their own like minded models. Then and only then would the subject matter of a car like this competing as is in stock be something to talk about. Own class, etc. Could it happen, who knows. Now the economics of currently building one of these for stock and superstock, aren't that compelling, as a 45K entry point or so is just the beginning. 100K done would likely be reasonable. Someone might do it, a wrecked car would be more $ reasonable. @ 413 HP I don't think it looks like a good package. I leave it up to those in the know on the delta between this motor and the Indy motors from last year in the Camaro, etc. A original E-Body 70 like mine or Jerry in Texas would be a better use of $ to go run at the windmills of A-Stock and A-Stick. If you want to play, be prepared to pay. Its a bonfire of the cash, of that all must agree, whether its a 69 big block camaro, a new Camaro, a new challenger, a new mustang, or even a old challenger or cuda...... Eric
__________________
Eric Merryfield 1883 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|