|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The data recorder is showing a significant rpm 'droop' (300 rpm - 400 rpm) after the car launches (converter flash)...sort of like a 'camel hump' in the run trace.
The car is a 350 ci SS/JA weighing about 3100 lb. The 60 ft times are good for this type car but wondering if they can be improved if the 'droop' is reduced??? I've noticed the Comp cars don't seem to have this issue, so is it something we're doing or just a characteristic of a Super Stock car??? What can be done to reduce or eliminate the 'droop?' Converter swap? Gearing? You just gotta live with it??? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 765
Likes: 75
Liked 524 Times in 141 Posts
|
![]()
That is the converter loading. It is normal to see that in a car like yours.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Getting the fuel curve right will help that!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Mine shows a couple hundred if it turns the tires a little. Dead hooks don't show it.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
All...thanks for the input.
@KRatcliff....what is different that the Comp cars don't see to have the 'droop?' @BlueOval Ralph...would you go leaner / richer in this area? I forgot to mention it is a fuel injected combo. Thanks for the help!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 765
Likes: 75
Liked 524 Times in 141 Posts
|
![]()
I cannot answer the question on the Comp cars due to zero experience with them. I can only surmise that the ones you may have seen may be leaving at a significantly higher RPM, the converter may be smaller (ie 7"), and the engine isn't pulled down as much or at all when the converter fully engages.
I have looked at the graphs of many fuel injected stockers and super stockers. Every one of them had the same hump. Even our super stocker with a carb combo has a hump. Most were 2 step cars, but a few were foot brake stockers. Any tuning that you do for this event is basically behind a curtain and you are not exactly sure what the A/F ratios are due to the action of the 2 step. I have a certain pattern of attack for that event, but that is just for my stuff and I have a lot to learn before I come close to getting these tunes right. Listen to the others with more experience than me on this. I was just giving you my experience. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 1710 Dutch Lane,Jeffersonville,IN
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
IMHO you don't see it is much in comp simply because of the nature of the beast, which is light, lighter, and lightest. The lighter cars with higher H.P. are naturally not going to be as susceptible to theese things.
But you should deffinately believe these guys are pointing you in the right direction, but in all honesty there are hundreds of things that if not exactly the right pieces or setup correctly that can cause this. I am assuming you are running an LT-1 in either a camaro or firebird from you info (and please correct me if I am wrong and that is not the case) and I have a little bit of experience with those engines and what you are talking about can make or break the way the car performs. Just for example, one of my best customers Jeff Dona was able to go a 1.18 sixty foot at bella rose. Now given, he is in I and you are J but I am guessing pretty close to the same basic combo, now I am not you so I don't know what you consider a "good" sixty foot time, but in my humble opinion I think Jeff's car is one of the best real super stockers off the line that I have ever seen. Last edited by Aaron Keown; 06-14-2012 at 10:26 AM. Reason: spelled off of |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 522
Liked 330 Times in 178 Posts
|
![]()
listen to Keowen if its who I am thinking it is he has built some fast stuff--Comp cars will/might/could have either a tiny flat line or a VERY small droop when the car first leaves the line usually its a rapid upward spike or you hope it is---- A Comp engine regardless of size is making at least 2.6 HP per CU IN and then the really good ones make all the way up to almost 3 HP per CU IN.possibly more!!! The starting line RPM 's ,( gearing , car weight etc.factored in) that they are leaving at too are such that the phenomonen(RPM drop) you are seeing is so small or does not even exist.
I think it would be unwise to try to compare a Super Stock engine such as yours with the graphs from a Comp engine based solely on the tremendous performance differential here... My suggestion would be to find and talk to a similiarly classed car owner/driver for their perspective on this... Also if you have a data recorder you should be talking to the manufacturer for his input on what you are seeing. They are constantly talking to racers so they might be able to figure out a bit what it is you need too. FED387 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
A little richer at peak torque if EFI give it a little pump shot
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Mine used to do it when it was too rich "down there". It was simply pulling the engine down. Now only if it turns the tires. 1.3X 60's there's a hump, 1.2X 60's, no hump.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 06-14-2012 at 02:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|