HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Class Racer Builds
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2015, 08:39 PM   #271
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by partsbob67 View Post
is that spacer legal between the manifold halves?
Likely not...I have that almost sorted out.

__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2015, 08:41 PM   #272
7423
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by partsbob67 View Post
is that spacer legal between the manifold halves?
Good eye Bob............
7423 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2015, 11:27 AM   #273
partsbob67
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: rohnert park,ca
Posts: 414
Likes: 11
Liked 79 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

i see. very nice build.
__________________
bob beals 7244
partsbob67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2015, 12:09 AM   #274
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Thanks to Aaron, the Speed Doctor for the excellent alternator bracket.



__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2015, 11:19 AM   #275
SSGT Mustang
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 35
Liked 204 Times in 54 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by HandOverFist View Post
I wasnt in the market for a built trans until recently when I realized a waiting on a suitable core was going to seriously put me behind. I would be interested in other's experiences with different convertors...this is not set in concrete yet.
You may want to consider a C5 core. It's a later version of the C4 with an improved case. The band adjusters are metric, I believe, with fine threads. It also has better fluid passages. You would need to change the bell housing to a C4 housing since the converters are different. But, they are nice transmissions, and worth a look. I believe that everything else in them is C4 (I can double check for you).

Some builders prefer the C4 by default because from what I can gather they are just used to building them. But, again, there's really no difference between a C4 and C5 other than some case improvements. From what I see the C5 seems to be a better transmission. I'm building a K/SA for my son, and will be using one.

Follow up: There may be some other differences. Going out for the day, but I'll take a closer look when I get back. Nevertheless, you should look into them.

Last edited by SSGT Mustang; 03-15-2015 at 11:30 AM.
SSGT Mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2015, 12:14 PM   #276
fordteacherguy
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 238
Likes: 38
Liked 160 Times in 51 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSGT Mustang View Post
You may want to consider a C5 core. It's a later version of the C4 with an improved case. The band adjusters are metric, I believe, with fine threads. It also has better fluid passages. You would need to change the bell housing to a C4 housing since the converters are different. But, they are nice transmissions, and worth a look. I believe that everything else in them is C4 (I can double check for you).

Some builders prefer the C4 by default because from what I can gather they are just used to building them. But, again, there's really no difference between a C4 and C5 other than some case improvements. From what I see the C5 seems to be a better transmission. I'm building a K/SA for my son, and will be using one.

Follow up: There may be some other differences. Going out for the day, but I'll take a closer look when I get back. Nevertheless, you should look into them.
C5's have a deeper bellhousing due to the deeper lock up converter they used, but have a improved oiling system that is a plus.The valve body is unique and is usually traded out for a C-4 valve body. Front band adjuster is a fine thread that is a 2:1 ratio to a stock C-4 course thread so you have to double your band clearance turns to 3 turns instead of the usual 1 1/2 turns. They are good cores to use if you swap the bellhousing for a C-4.
__________________
Brian Thompson
NHRA Stock / Super Stock
Class P/SA 6665 SS/MA 6665
fordteacherguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2015, 01:45 PM   #277
Steve Stickel
Member
 
Steve Stickel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Coast, Massachusetts
Posts: 146
Likes: 160
Liked 50 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordteacherguy View Post
C5's have a deeper bellhousing due to the deeper lock up converter they used, but have a improved oiling system that is a plus.The valve body is unique and is usually traded out for a C-4 valve body. Front band adjuster is a fine thread that is a 2:1 ratio to a stock C-4 course thread so you have to double your band clearance turns to 3 turns instead of the usual 1 1/2 turns. They are good cores to use if you swap the bellhousing for a C-4.

Not to take this thread off topic... Question,

What years and models was the C5 trans used ? Also, any visual markings or way to indentify them once removed from the vehicle? I would like to have a couple of good cores under the bench just in case.....

Thanks ,
__________________
Steve Stickel
1161 Stk
1167 SS
Steve Stickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2015, 04:07 PM   #278
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 317
Liked 1,105 Times in 303 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by HandOverFist View Post
Ok guys...when you stop laughing can someone remind me what the heck this hole was used for?



May be unrelated, but I seem to remember reading at one time Ford used, or was planning to use a sensor running off either the flywheel or rear crank flange to read a signal from. Possibly that is what that hole was for, acsess for a sensor?
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2015, 08:24 PM   #279
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

I need to purchase a flexplate and have noticed two different configurations for a C4...one with a single step and the other with a dual step. What/why the difference and which do I need?
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2015, 08:28 PM   #280
black88coupe
Member
 
black88coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 352
Likes: 18
Liked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by HandOverFist View Post
Thanks to Aaron, the Speed Doctor for the excellent alternator bracket.
That is a nice piece.
__________________
Mitch Beri- The Motor City
1985 GT- “Stock-ish” 5.0 motor, AOD/ trans brake. 12.68 @ 101.31mph.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/FOXBODYFLEAMARKET/
black88coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.