|
![]() |
#11 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Land of Bayous, Boudin & Crawfish
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 223
Liked 747 Times in 362 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
But what they meant was that the Cam Am was legal only with an auto, and not with a stick. The site I checked said they came only with a TH400, and none were produced with a stick. I'm not real familiar with the Can Am, so I'll do a bit more research on 'em. I do like the looks of 'em, for whatever that's worth. ![]() And the hp factor difference is 20hp instead of 60-70. I just looked at the '78 W-72 specs. The factor is the same as the '77. But there is no note about using a manual only. So, I assume that you can run an auto in a '78. But, the engine is only legal in a Formula or a TA. For '77 it is listed as being legal in the Lemans, including wagons, as well as the Birds and Cam Am. So, one of the '77 Lemans models would probably be the cheapest body you could use, with a W-72 400 / auto. http://www.classracerinfo.com/Engine...spx?ENGINE=317 http://www.classracerinfo.com/Engine...spx?ENGINE=765 Of the later model 400's I still think the '77 180hp 400, in any body except a Bird is the best low comp 400 combo, at 260hp factor. About the only difference I can see in the 2 motors is cam lift. But, since there is no limit on dur, the cam shouldn't make that much difference. But then I've never run either engine, so I'll leave that call for the experts. ![]() http://www.classracerinfo.com/Engine...spx?ENGINE=764 http://www.classracerinfo.com/Engine...spx?ENGINE=764 Last edited by oldskool; 01-24-2015 at 03:06 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|