Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.

Boogeyman Bill · 07-09-2008, 06:23 PM

Here's my 2 cents.

It should be the race tracks responsibility to ensure that there is ample turn-offs and track distance. PERIOD. It is NHRA's responsiblity to determine what that track distance should be (based on the speeds). And it is also NHRA's responsiblity to ensure the tracks comply with the rules. Hell! That's one of the reasons we pay our membership dues for isn't it?

So I say, (1) don't slow down; (2) don't shorten the run; and (3) don't put band-ads where they aren't needed.

If lengthening the track means I pay a bit more to race, so be it. Hell I'm already poor, what's a few more dollars.

07-09-2008, 06:23 PM	#13
Boogeyman Bill Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Oakland, CA Posts: 19 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft. Here's my 2 cents. It should be the race tracks responsibility to ensure that there is ample turn-offs and track distance. PERIOD. It is NHRA's responsiblity to determine what that track distance should be (based on the speeds). And it is also NHRA's responsiblity to ensure the tracks comply with the rules. Hell! That's one of the reasons we pay our membership dues for isn't it? So I say, (1) don't slow down; (2) don't shorten the run; and (3) don't put band-ads where they aren't needed. If lengthening the track means I pay a bit more to race, so be it. Hell I'm already poor, what's a few more dollars.