|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happy Valley, OR
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
But if it is close to the 3" min height you won't know which one to do. Wouldn't it be better to always know you are racing the wheel?
__________________
Michael Pliska 643 S/G |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Good topic.
I've measured my home track at 5". The body work on most tube cars will trip the beam with the nose. I saw a finish line photo of two comp cars (I believe Arnie martel was one of them) with one nose clearly in front but at full throttle it was high enough that didn't trip till the tire. The opponent's car was lower, a good foot behind, but because he tripped with the nose, got the win light. It's a quirk of the system. Full suspension cars such as stock and superstock will trip with the wheel unless the driver drops hard, which collapses the suspension and trips the beam (often) with the front spoiler...this gets complicated because now the driver has tried to kill some et and actually picks some up. Makes for some funny numbers. I believe it's actually pretty rare that it happens. Bruce Deveau |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Virtually all dragsters made today have either a nose or wing, extending in front of the front wheels, with a vertical surface that is several inches high with the full intent of tripping the beams.
__________________
Chris Williams 6304 SC, TD, ET |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happy Valley, OR
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Here is a link to the aforementioned comp photo:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/9053883@N06/1356172176/ And some discussion about it: http://forum.competitionplus.com/showthread.php?t=1491 This link has several other links, including the infamous Steve Johnson photo. In the case of missing his low profile tire, lower beams (as I am suggesting here) would have HELPED the situation, as they would have been below the height of the opening in Johnson's wheel, and guaranteed a longer duration blocking the beams. Does anyone have a good reason why the beams should NOT be lower?
__________________
Michael Pliska 643 S/G |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() If the beam hight had been the same as the starting line and the tire hops over it, then it doesn't see anything until the back wheels... The Pro Stock Bikes were wheelstanding through the finishline at Maple Grove because of the bumps there. Also, take a look at the image below. A 3" nose, under braking, is not 3": ![]() So now you'd be taking a whole bunch of cars that consistently take the beam with the nose of the car, and making it so they take it with the wheel, well, except under braking. Then you have the same problem of figuring out what the car is going to take it with again anyway... -Mike |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Happy Valley, OR
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Okay, I hadn't thought about bouncy finish lines, but holy crap - they should fix that track!!!
If finish line wheelies are still a problem, they could run a guard beam that is higher but farther downtrack. The tire would stop the clocks 99.9% of the time, and they would still have a close timing result for the rare misses. With the lower beams, you might have the occasional braking-induced nose trip, but it seems that it would be the rare exception. I would rather see true wheel-to-wheel racing the majority of the time.
__________________
Michael Pliska 643 S/G Last edited by Michael Pliska; 08-31-2009 at 09:11 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|