HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Class Racer Builds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2014, 04:02 PM   #1
Dave Turner
VIP Member
 
Dave Turner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schomberg, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 1,606
Liked 364 Times in 138 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo

Quote:
Originally Posted by HandOverFist View Post
Speaking of parts wanted/needed - I'm looking for a extended fuel fitting, 1"x20 8AN for a Edelbrock carb like the one pictured below but have had no luck locating a source. Anyone have a link?

I think quadrajetparts.com has a 2 piece solution for you. A 1" extension plus an inverted flare to -8 adapter.
__________________
Dave Turner
SS/GT #1153
Dave Turner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 04:18 PM   #2
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Turner View Post
I think quadrajetparts.com has a 2 piece solution for you. A 1" extension plus an inverted flare to -8 adapter.
Dave - This is all I come up with in the search box... http://quadrajetparts.com/rochester-...ing-p-367.html
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 08:45 PM   #3
Dave Turner
VIP Member
 
Dave Turner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schomberg, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 1,606
Liked 364 Times in 138 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo

Quote:
Originally Posted by HandOverFist View Post
Dave - This is all I come up with in the search box... http://quadrajetparts.com/rochester-...ing-p-367.html
This is the link to the extension fitting:
http://quadrajetparts.com/rochester-...ing-p-436.html

Then you need this adapter - (available from other sources.)
http://quadrajetparts.com/rochester-...ing-p-370.html

I assumed that you were working with a Quadrajet carb. The search continues.
__________________
Dave Turner
SS/GT #1153
Dave Turner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 02:24 AM   #4
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Turner View Post
This is the link to the extension fitting:
http://quadrajetparts.com/rochester-...ing-p-436.html

Then you need this adapter - (available from other sources.)
http://quadrajetparts.com/rochester-...ing-p-370.html

I assumed that you were working with a Quadrajet carb. The search continues.
Dave - I think that combination would actually work on the Edelbrock quadrajet. It would be a little longer than my current fittings, but longer is much easier to deal with than shorter...thanks buddy!
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 08:14 AM   #5
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo

I raced a G/SA Nova back in the mid '90s for a season or two.
P/G 350/255 It went high 11's with a very old school engine.

It did sixty foot very well for the et......low 1.50's so If I had that Camaro with a 3 speed and hi compression engine I would be looking for 60 foot times in the low 1.40's....

The hi compression engines were always tougher to make run fast relative to the low compression engines. HP difference was not realistic.

I still would like to have that car.....I like my dragster but still love Camaro stockers....Have fun...enjoy it...
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 10:43 AM   #6
Bob Gullett
VIP Member
 
Bob Gullett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 57
Liked 507 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo

This is what I use in mine with my Edelbrock Q-Jet

http://www.jegs.com/i/Russell/799/640350/10002/-1
You can use a 45 degree AN fitting on your hose or use one of these if you already have a straight fitting.

http://summitracing.com/dom/parts/ea...8erl/overview/
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S
Bob Gullett is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 12:11 PM   #7
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Biebel View Post
I raced a G/SA Nova back in the mid '90s for a season or two.
P/G 350/255 It went high 11's with a very old school engine.

It did sixty foot very well for the et......low 1.50's so If I had that Camaro with a 3 speed and hi compression engine I would be looking for 60 foot times in the low 1.40's....

The hi compression engines were always tougher to make run fast relative to the low compression engines. HP difference was not realistic.

I still would like to have that car.....I like my dragster but still love Camaro stockers....Have fun...enjoy it...
Yeah Rich, I'm expecting drastic improvement this go. Pretty sure the very first pass last Saturday bent the perches at the initial hit and it was fighting a bad pinion angle all the way down the track...amazing it was able to muster a 7.21 in the 1/8 mile. My gut tells me this car should 60' at least a 1.48. I'll be tickled to death if it runs a 11.20 in the 1/4 mile.

__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 12:25 PM   #8
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: '67 Camaro E/SA redo

E/SA and a good car is probably running 10.80 in decent air.

11.20 is a good start and MPH tells the tale on power. 115-116 is probably also a realistic number to expect. They tend to MPH pretty weak.....

Whatever it runs......do a little tricky math I do to gauge how it is running.

Multiply your ET by your MPH and see what number comes up.

1300 is weak on MPH and most stockers would run numbers in the 1300's or 1310's

Fast cars that run good MPH will be 1340 or higher

A very good balanced bracket car is in the 1330's....

It's just a factor number that can help gauge how well a car ET's vs MPH...and since Stockers ET very well vs MPH they will be at the low end of the scale...

Steep first gear.....low gear in the rear.....good for ET's ....
Restrictive cam,heads and intake manifold.....not good for MPH...


Fast bracket cars like my dragster will pick up 30+ mph on the back half......I run an average of 146 at the 1/8th and run 177-178+ with injection......

Stockers are fun but slow by comparison.....
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R

Last edited by Rich Biebel; 03-04-2014 at 12:29 PM.
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.