|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
I used an Opti for a while. Not gutted. It can be done with the Opti electronics, although I nener tried it. Some of the Stocker guys are doing that. I now use an MSD dist with cam sync. I didn't find sequential to be the huge HP deal some make it out to be. Still, 5 to 7 hp is worth the effort. I had 2 cyls 9 & 10% lean, the rest were 2 & 3% off.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lower Slower Delaware
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
Liked 269 Times in 99 Posts
|
![]()
For reasons David mentioned, believe there is potential with sequential but not necessarily in the range we would assume.
Upper RPMs would be little gain unless all the legwork was done and then it may be minimal for the cost and effort. But consider what we pay for 5 HP.......... The greater benefit should be in low / mid range RPMs getting the car moving and to the 330. When foot-breaking the effort may be worth it making the car easier to drive.
__________________
Frank Ferrucci I/SA 1271 "Be Thankful for the Gifts You are Given" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
My converter flashes to ~6200, my cylinder- to-cylinder air/fuel imbalance was a little different, but no worse, at 6000 than at 8500.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 03-11-2014 at 10:14 AM. Reason: Still can't type.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 80
Likes: 12
Liked 27 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Nick. I am truly blessed to do what I enjoy for a living.
As for a cam sync on an LT1, there are several ways to accomplish this; 1. Use a distributor body w no cap/rotor, remove seven of the reluctor teeth and use the remaining tooth as a cam position sensor. 2. Use a distributor with a built in cam sync like Ed suggested. 3. You can use the factory Optispark as a cam sync with the following modification- use some metallic tape (the silver, aluminum stuff) and tape over all the slots in the Opti disk. Then, locate a slot in that wheel that will generate a single signal somewhere between 130BTDC and 60BTDC (for a FAST system, not sure about others) poke the tape through this single slot in the wheel. This sounds kind of hokey but it works! 4. Fabricate a custom aluminum wheel that will mount to the Opti shaft and a bracket to hold a pickup. All of these obviously assume the use of a crank trigger for a crank signal. To clear the air on the sequential fueling question, I do believe that there is power to be found in properly utilizing Sequential fueling, but it takes specific testing to find this power. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
Here is a funny story...
When I first ran my LT-1 Stocker....I misunderstood how to enter the firing order when running bank to bank... I entered the std Chevy F.O. Engine sounded like a boat and ran worse than one....LOL I discovered my mistake pretty quickly and moved on.... Was at my local track one day and heard an LT-1 Stocker drive by me and heard the same sound......I went over and asked the owner a few questions and told him I think he made the same mistake....firing order entered was not correct for bank to bank operation..... I know most people go to a pro for a tune up and it is well worth the time and money to do.......I definitely regret not going that route with my LT-1
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 476
Likes: 20
Liked 70 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Don't know how many of you follow the Engine Masters contest but the 3/14 issue of Pop Hot Rod has an article on the engine Jon Kaase won with this year. After reading it I decided I was overdue for a lunch visit so I went to the shop.
The engine was a Ford 409 4valve mod motor. One cool thing was the set of 16 tube headers, but the interesting part of the FI system was the injector location. I am only going to tell what is in the article since I don't know how much of what I was told is public but the injectors are about 1/2 way up the runner and pointing toward the plenum. There were several locations tried but this was what went to the contest. Jon said it was hard to tune and lower rpm was not smooth. I think the dyno runs were from 3500 to 6500 so you can't give up bottom for top end power since they average the numbers over the range. Made over 800 on VP100 but was tuned for 720 at the contest. Not something that can be done in a Stocker but in Superstock it could be done.
__________________
Stewart Way 2424 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lower Slower Delaware
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
Liked 269 Times in 99 Posts
|
![]()
Have heard of and read a few articles on this.
Injecting fuel behind the valve may not be the best location for atomization and mixture. Moving injector up the intake runner may allow better fuel distribution in the air stream. Pointing the injector into the air stream would seem to force the issue. Some high HP engines have two sets of injectors: at the valve and up in the runner. Has anyone played with direct injection in a HP application? Sounds like fun.
__________________
Frank Ferrucci I/SA 1271 "Be Thankful for the Gifts You are Given" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|