|
|
|
|
07-25-2014, 08:16 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 18
Liked 154 Times in 34 Posts
|
Re: 1978 Mustang II
so the 1978 302 mustang came with a 1.08 carb and never came with a 1.21 carb? but somehow it was approved by NHRA for stock? and....and some people knew it and didn't say anything to NHRA...meanwhile records are being set and class wallys are being won and we are all ok with this...really? someone tell me this is not so..brian
Last edited by B/S 428; 07-25-2014 at 08:22 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
07-25-2014, 10:51 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,822
Likes: 2,916
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
Re: 1978 Mustang II
Quote:
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2014, 12:02 AM
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 18
Liked 154 Times in 34 Posts
|
Re: 1978 Mustang II
okay-so is the NHRA approved carb for this combo is the 1.21 or 1.08?
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2014, 01:18 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,822
Likes: 2,916
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
Re: 1978 Mustang II
Quote:
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2014, 12:21 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Green Creek (Tryon) North Carolina
Posts: 331
Likes: 69
Liked 99 Times in 21 Posts
|
Re: 1978 Mustang II
Number = CFM
.98 = 190 1.01 = 240 1.02 = 245 1.08 = 287 1.14 = 300 1.21 = 351 1.23 = 356 1.33 = 424 Found this online after wondering how much difference was in the two carbs. Don Jackson |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
