|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
There has to be some validity to the thinner oil weights overall. Nascar engine builders put way more time and effort into research and actual use of products as well as methods than most ever will. I believe in real world results and won't discount anything without concrete evidence contrary.
__________________
Rich Taylor I/SA - 321 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 710
Likes: 2,677
Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
When you have some time to read, give this a look see. It completely changed my thinking on the subject. http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/motor-oil-101/
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 710
Likes: 2,677
Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]()
But given your progress on that Mustang I doubt you have ANY reading time. Nice work.
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Land of Bayous, Boudin & Crawfish
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 223
Liked 747 Times in 362 Posts
|
![]()
I'm new to the site, so there are a LOT of things I don't understand about it yet. So if this seems to be another dummy question, ya'll will just have to forgive me, OK ?
I understand that there are far more Chevy racers than probably all others combined. But I just noticed that the BB Camaro build, with only 20 posts and just over 4,000 views has got a 5 star rating. But this thread, which has over 200 posts and nearly 46,000 views, don't even have a 1 star rating. ![]() Is it because the car is a Pontiac, instead of a Chevy ? Or maybe because it's a budget build ? I think this is a GREAT thread and definitely deserves 5 stars, if any do. Hey, ya'll, don't hate me cause I love Pontiacs, OK ? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
Ratings are based on individuals making the effor to rank a thread. Most of us don't pay any attention to the rankings. Any thread I read is important.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 1,074
Liked 799 Times in 236 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I just gave him 5 stars. ![]()
__________________
"That'll never work....." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Land of Bayous, Boudin & Crawfish
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 223
Liked 747 Times in 362 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Middletown, IN
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Guys...i didnt even know you could rate it...hehe
You'll all be interested to know, ive got a bigger cam, and goin to light 350 Trans... Converter may get restalled, as well...but , may try it 1st. goin to a 266/272, over the little 251/256 that i have now... Im hoping that some weight management, the aforementioned changes, and some super tuning, will get me into the 11.teens, this season...
__________________
1968 Bird/TRW 455/Home ported 13's, '70 Qjet,Holley Street Dominator manifold, Comp Solid FT, 10.817/122.30/1.440 Workin' on E/SA combo ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|