HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Class Racer Builds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2015, 01:56 AM   #1
Dave Noll
Senior Member
 
Dave Noll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 710
Likes: 2,709
Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Just for reference, the BARO reading in this area (elevation 1050) is about 157Hz. Different area's will vary, higher elevation, lower Hz.

Earlier I wasn't really suggesting locking out the O2 sensors. I just wanted to know if that particular unit had the capability. @ full throttle the stock ECU ignores input from the O2's, uses pre-programmed values until throttle goes under about 80%.
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526
Dave Noll is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 06:16 AM   #2
Tony Corley
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 264
Likes: 42
Liked 61 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Car looks good Rich. It has been a great build to watch, you should be proud.
David, the Anderson Ford PMS he is running is a piggyback system that will allow the factory ecm to do as much or as little as you want. If I remember correctly, it can go into full standalone mode over 2000 rpm, if you want it too. They are a good, simple system to use.
Tony Corley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2015, 07:03 AM   #3
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Yes, I have standalone activated @ 10 percent TPS and 2500rpm for the fuel and timing tables. I have taken 10 percent fuel away @ idle and zeroed the values @ WOT due to the 24 pound injectors pending wideband readings on the track. The Acell table was a stab in the dark, but my initial programming seems close by yesterday's stabs on the concrete pad.

I did not dabble at all in any of the part throttle settings. My only concern atm is will the engine start easily, idle cleanly and be sufficiently lean at WOT. Btw, I changed out those Southside lift bars for straight lowers for the time being...figured the less I had to deal with getting it down the track to begin with the better. I did put the swaybar back on...will see after the first outing if an airbag in the RR will be needed.
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321

Last edited by HandOverFist; 05-03-2015 at 07:41 AM.
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2015, 07:48 PM   #4
fordteacherguy
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 238
Likes: 38
Liked 160 Times in 51 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by HandOverFist View Post
Yes, I have standalone activated @ 10 percent TPS and 2500rpm for the fuel and timing tables. I have taken 10 percent fuel away @ idle and zeroed the values @ WOT due to the 24 pound injectors pending wideband readings on the track. The Acell table was a stab in the dark, but my initial programming seems close by yesterday's stabs on the concrete pad.

I did not dabble at all in any of the part throttle settings. My only concern atm is will the engine start easily, idle cleanly and be sufficiently lean at WOT. Btw, I changed out those Southside lift bars for straight lowers for the time being...figured the less I had to deal with getting it down the track to begin with the better. I did put the swaybar back on...will see after the first outing if an airbag in the RR will be needed.
Rich,

Looks like you are getting in the ballpark..thats the toughest hurdle to get over. Keep the digital factory baro..the analog GM MAP will not work without programming and a harness and it has no advantage to your Baro sensor. If you wish to see if your baro is responding on your controller, take a reading with the key on engine off and apply some vacuum to the baro port with a hand pump and see if the baro changes on your scanner. If it changes ...I guess its working and responding...the HZ check on the sensing wire will tell for sure.

Good luck on the shakedowns...I'd shoot for about a 13:1 A/F to run well, my ET falls off a bunch below 12.8.

Good Luck!
__________________
Brian Thompson
NHRA Stock / Super Stock
Class P/SA 6665 SS/MA 6665
fordteacherguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 01:13 AM   #5
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Thanks Brian - I need to weld another bung in the collector for the wideband before Saturday for sure. If I understand this PMS correctly when in standalone mode it will try to maintain a 12.8 A/F ratio. I may in the end need to take it out of standalone and manually input data to get it leaner at WOT.

You were correct about the timing advancing wildly under light load...I have seen up to 42 degrees winging the engine at the shop in the controller screen. It would probably be money well spent to invest in some type of recorder to review all parameters with known settings after a blast down the track. Considering this... http://www.andersonfordmotorsport.co...icro-flashacq/
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321

Last edited by HandOverFist; 05-05-2015 at 01:28 AM.
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 12:35 AM   #6
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Loaded for the early morning alignment appointment. Those low profile ramps were the best solution I could come up with to be able to open the door over the trailer fender with this low slung pig. The next time I load I will try elevating just the fronts or rears to see if it clears. I did manage to get the O2 bung installed while on the trailer for the wideband sensor. Initial outing will be with those Goodrich TA radial DOT tires on it...18psi sound about right with a light burnout? If the car shows potential I will order some M/T 26" drag radials.



__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321

Last edited by HandOverFist; 05-06-2015 at 01:18 AM.
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 01:21 AM   #7
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 319
Liked 1,106 Times in 303 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Those ramps look interesting. How tall are they, and where did you buy them?
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.