|
![]() |
#30 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
In giving thought to this post I am struggling with exactly how to present this change.
My struggle is mostly based on my long time, make that lifelong quest to go faster. Yet, here is, a smaller carb. Whew, what an adjustment. However, at least in theory, the 4 GC does hold an advantage for the Super 10. Originally I ran it as the 327/300/293 with Quick Fuel 585 carb. As the numbers worked out I was 120 or so pounds too heavy for "B" but could not drop to "C" because the 327/300/293 makes it a natural "A" package. The truck is as light as I can practically make it [within reason] To reduce it by 100 + pounds would require a moly cage and new moly back half. That is simply not a reasonable option Enter the 327/250/270 with Rochester 4 GC. Now I can run "C" and only be about 35 or so pounds heavy. In addition, with an 11.10 index in "C" I may be able to move up a few places on the qualifying ladder. So, we will see. I hear good feedback about the 4CG running well and being consistent. Yet, it sure is small ![]()
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|