|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,954 Times in 491 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 709
Likes: 2,663
Liked 238 Times in 111 Posts
|
![]()
Bracket raced mostly street cars. I did not buy an existing Stocker. I am building it myself.
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 172
Likes: 673
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]()
Gordie, you have a PM.
Rick Thomason GTOMayhem |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,157
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
How about we get the LT1 hp factor lowered?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
|
![]()
I thought 2 of the 3 racers with the trucks were existing racers? Either way no big deal. How about just giving the indexes back the .3 they removed a half a decade ago? That way everyone benefits, not just new racers or combos. I hardly even start mine anymore.
__________________
Lane Weber It`s Not What You Drive That Wins....It`s How You Drive It |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
Proposal # 1 looks good !
proposal # 2 , ummm, well, proposal # 1 looks better. I had a discussion with a ( now new) Division director about this same subject several months back. There are combos in the classification guide that have not been tried due to the factored h.p. being too high. We both agreed that if NHRA made a 20% hp reduction for all OBD II cars it would allow racers to get these '96 and newer car (that are cheap on car lots right now) onto the track. From there the AHFS will take over. I consider my mid 80's T-Bird an ancient car now. I cannot imagine how hard it would be to find a nice condition 60's-70's car at a decent price, in decent condition and priced low enough that you can afford to cut on it and put a roll bar in it.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT Last edited by ALMACK; 03-06-2017 at 01:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,900
Liked 5,113 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
![]()
Doesn't fall within the guidelines of this thread.
Quote:
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Bless your heart.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
^^ That # 1 speaks volumes. A combo that has not gone more than 4 tenths under most certainly needs some help. # 2 is a good idea because there are a bunch of dormant combos in the guide all ready to go...just waiting on a hp reduction. A 20% reduction to the current factored h.p. would most certainly get new racers out to the track. I have several friends that look thru the classification guide like myself while looking for a combo that is cheap to buy and easy to get to run the index. But most are factored too high...
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT Last edited by ALMACK; 03-06-2017 at 02:03 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|