|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 64
Liked 777 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Look, if anyone wants to imagine all the negatives that can happen because of this hp reduction, go for it. However, if ten new participants get to experience the fun, the comradery, the "Stocker community" and the thrills of the competitive racing we all have, we will all be better off and stronger. The purpose here is not to create a bunch of dime-rocket index killers (NHRA has shown to be plenty capable of doing that on their own). The intent is to try to attract more racers and expand on one of the core values of the Stock Eliminator category, showcasing the variety of American automobile history.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 3,588
Liked 7,688 Times in 1,732 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 885
Likes: 1,586
Liked 384 Times in 149 Posts
|
![]()
I think its an excellent idea.
20% reduction; 351W or M @ 230hp = 184hp 400M @ 240 = 192hp 300FI @ 190 = 152hp (coincidence was rated at 155hp with carb, good start point) 302 93 truck@ 215 = 172 (f series most sold truck, tell me 172hp wouldn't bring them out!) 460 @ 300 = 240hp I think this idea is awesome, as soon as they're built and out there, then the factoring can begin. But, they only get factored if they hit the trigger, you can have guys build a combo, race it at -.500 all day long and enjoy the sport. Yes they might lose a heads up, at that point maybe they'll step it up, but they are still out there. If a killer combo is built, again, the trigger will be hit and they'll be awarded their present. Love the idea, definitely get more cars out! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 36
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 64
Liked 777 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]()
Believe me, I do too. But considering that the current class guide likely has several hundred index killers in it, even if the hp reduction move will add to that list the cars will have to be built before anyone gets concerned. I don't see many of the very capable cars that are currently in the class guide being built. If creating the opportunity for a lot of older cars to be competitive causes new cars to be built, that's way more important that worrying about them being a 'threat'. If they get built by new folks, we have expanded Stock Eliminator and that is the goal. If they get built by current racers, we have generated some new excitement and that is the goal. If they spur some 'retired' racers to come back out, then we have re-engaged some bystanders and that is the goal. The goal is to grow Stock Eliminator and make it fun for as many as possible.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 36
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
Let's hope it works then
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Md
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Most 6 cyl cars are rated higher than some V-8's now.
Great idea to get out diverse and older makes for sure. Some folks leave the stands when stock is called because they don't want to see a line of Camaros. Goodluck w/nhra Ron. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 885
Likes: 1,586
Liked 384 Times in 149 Posts
|
![]()
You're so right Ron, check out any v6 or inline 6 ford in the truck section. The inline 300 is at 190hp, I tried to get it lowered last year and was denied. Look at the 302 in another truck at 215, which has approved rods/pistons/etc there is no comparison.
20% would take it to 152, it was originally at 155 with a carb and no doubt will make more than that with FI, but it would be incentive to build it. I would suspect after being hit (maxed out) it would end up around 175-180. Cubic $$$ will only take it so far, I don't see it ever hitting 190 or more. The 2bbl 302 got some new cars built, but have they "took over the world" like some on here predicted? No, it was a good "proof in concept" of the idea and it worked. More cars were built and the ones that were pushed hard were corrected...kinda exactly like a win-win right?? I really like the idea. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Before I started racing again, I started going to some national events to watch my old friend Mike Edwards run Pro Stock. I would go stay in the stands to watch some friends run Stock & Super Stock. When the fuel cars finished, the stands would empty. I asked several people leaving "Why don't you watch these?" Every time they would answer "Too slow", not one time did anybody mention a particular kind of car. Always just "Too slow". Guessing not enough noise or 300 MPH.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,814
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,118 Times in 1,950 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It's almost like there's two NHRAs now, and they don't seem to care much about ours. Don't mean to go o/t here.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|