|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 909
Likes: 70
Liked 239 Times in 114 Posts
|
![]()
What method did you use to figure out your clearance ? Clay with full valve springs , or dial indicator with a light checking spring ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,650
Likes: 1,942
Liked 10,767 Times in 2,238 Posts
|
![]()
Use more deck clearance and keep the gasket thin. You will need about .035 '' total to keep pistons from contacting head. Have P/V clearance through the range of adjustment, so you can roll the cam forward or backwards without bending stuff. Exhaust valve will like to make contact in split overlap.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massapequa Park,NY
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 1,904
Liked 974 Times in 310 Posts
|
![]()
Having the correct cam timing is more important then losing a half a point of compression.
__________________
1989 Camaro Iroc-Z I/SA B&B Auto Machine Shop. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 230
Likes: 23
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Checking springs, with an indicator on the retainer
I've already moved the cam around to give me the most intake clearance, which has been the biggest problem, and still have around twice that amount of exhaust clearance. Piston is .010 in the hole, spec is .004. I'm leaning on leaving the valves alone and using whatever gasket gives me the clearance needed. Those 2 together should give me the .035 Larry mentioned. In hindsight, I should have gotten a smaller cam so I could keep some compression........
__________________
Brian Carpenter Stock 1358 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 324
Likes: 625
Liked 179 Times in 89 Posts
|
![]()
Cut the valve face a few thousands.
Also the cam could be ground to twink the duration, you won't lose compression and horsepower loss is negligible. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 909
Likes: 70
Liked 239 Times in 114 Posts
|
![]()
Indicator method is good , but usually gives the closest value . When the real springs are used the clearance will be greater . Would be nice to be able to run the cam advanced , but that would be based on dyno testing .
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massapequa Park,NY
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 1,904
Liked 974 Times in 310 Posts
|
![]()
As Russ says, check with actual spring pressure. You'll have more p to v clearance.
__________________
1989 Camaro Iroc-Z I/SA B&B Auto Machine Shop. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 230
Likes: 23
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
I think for now we'll leave the valve job as is, I'd hate to lose anything there. I really just need to decide how much to deck the head. Once I get the head from the shop, I'll check it with race springs and see where it's at. Then I'll just get a gasket that will give me what is needed. This project is taking forever and I just want it on the track. Next winter I can do some of the trimming of the valve head and maybe re-grind the cam, hopefully that will enable me to then get a thinner gasket and get some of the compression back. thanks all
__________________
Brian Carpenter Stock 1358 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massapequa Park,NY
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 1,904
Liked 974 Times in 310 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1989 Camaro Iroc-Z I/SA B&B Auto Machine Shop. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|