|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 532
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
Todd-- look at the video --the launch RPM appears to be about 62-6300----- is that low ?? 1-2 shift was 72-7300 did she nose over or over rev the engine???-----2-3 shift is about 66-6700 is this too low???--------3-4 shift is again low in the 6600 range--- do you agree ??? Not sure what racepak is showing but the shift points are all over the place that might be what is giving you goofy ET's.---you have a fairly heavy car with a low HP engine and once you run out of gear going into high gear it just does not have enough power to recover and produce a real good ET.----Not being overly critical but the driver must aim for consistent shift points ---are your RPM shift points in the correct range not too high or not too low???---what is your finish line RPM it seems to be fairly low shouldn't it be in a higher range looks like low 6200-6300 range???--just my observations from the video----FED 387
Last edited by FED 387; 09-30-2019 at 12:04 PM. Reason: number |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,910
Liked 5,131 Times in 1,956 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
Just going off the online Wallace calculators.
Your ET / MPH computed from your vehicle weight of 3400 pounds and HP of 390 is 11.99 seconds and MPH of 112.73 MPH. That's optimistic IMHO....The car did go 12.0 something so its not far off.....Don't know the MPH on that 12.0 run......MPH indicates HP better than ET.... 11.99 x 112.73 =1351 and that is very high of a factor number for a limited cyl head type stocker...…..They are usually weak on MPH with fast ET's due to gearing. Your biggest ET gain is in the first part of the run with a Stocker... Just yesterday at Maple Grove some H/SA cars were running 11.0's......at about 116 we'll say......11.09 x 116.7 I think I saw....do the math...thats1294...…..Very fast ET......not a lot of MPH....not sure if that was flat down on it......maybe off one or two MPH's at most...…. A Low compression 350... I did not think the run sounded like the clutch was slipping badly at all.... RPM did not flair.....engine was weak and rpm did not climb.... Its been way to many years since I had a stick shift car. We had no rev limiters, just picked an RPM and held it there...... Most stick racers I watch put it to the mat on the first or second amber and on a chip...… She's doing a pretty good job and just needs more laps......and some tuning to get the most out of what's there....It's Way harder than driving an automatic.....
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R Last edited by Rich Biebel; 09-30-2019 at 03:32 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,955 Times in 492 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Here's the Waller 1/8 mile calculation, remember we only ran it just past the 1/8th. ![]()
__________________
Todd Greene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I wired the stock horn button to work the line lock on our ‘68 Nova back in 1969. That car had a built in rev limiter. It would just go flat at 6000 or less with what we had to work with back then...Some cams pulled up a little higher at 6200.....Hydraulic lifters, stock springs, stock rockers. 12.20’s at 114+ was best numbers back in 1970 on 7” tires ! 10-1 compression 350... The clutch was low tech. Schiefer RevLoc diaphragm clutch, 10-1/2” GM disc 11” 30lb wheel.
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R Last edited by Rich Biebel; 09-30-2019 at 09:05 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,955 Times in 492 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Todd Greene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I drove one and that’s with stamped rockers and springs that had about 100lbs on the seat IIRC.. The difference from a hydraulic cam engine to a solid cam was like night and day.
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,955 Times in 492 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Todd Greene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 57
Liked 509 Times in 117 Posts
|
![]()
Hey Todd. Watched the in car video and Autumn did everything right including the burnout. The burnout you can do in 2nd or 3rd. Doesn't matter. I've made enough runs on mine to know missing a shift point (which I've done lots LOL) unless you hit the limiter will maybe affect ET a few hundredths. She's doing good and will get better and more comfortable with seat time. Getting a clutch to be perfect can be tough. Once you get the racepak working it will be an amazing tool to make sure the clutch is working as it should. Have enjoyed following the build of the Nova.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,955 Times in 492 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Todd Greene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|