|
08-22-2010, 01:49 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 675
Likes: 143
Liked 72 Times in 40 Posts
|
Re: Lesser Cost Enclosed trailer?
Check the curb weight also, depending on what you're pulling it with.
|
08-22-2010, 03:18 PM | #12 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: Lesser Cost Enclosed trailer?
no doubt, some of the pace/united/haulmark/vintage types can get very heavy very quickly
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
08-22-2010, 04:03 PM | #13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 132
Liked 220 Times in 95 Posts
|
Re: Lesser Cost Enclosed trailer?
We had a Haulmark 24' Thrfty Hauler for about 4 years, sold it for what we paid for it. It served us well. Stepped up to a loaded 28' Pace and couldn't be happier.
__________________
Floyd Staggs 787 SST |
08-22-2010, 08:00 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Maxton N.C.
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Lesser Cost Enclosed trailer?
Check these out can not beat there prices also 5 year Limited Warranty
They also have them in ALL Aluminum trailers http://www.trailershowroom.com/85x30chl.htm
__________________
Kevin Mclamb IHRA H/R & Top/Sportsman #9416 |
|
|