|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: WAKE FOREST,NC
Posts: 161
Likes: 90
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Before the CCRA was actually formed, notification went out here on class racer concerning forming a Stock/Super Stock racing association. The meeting was held in a central location which was Burlington, N.C. Only a handful of racers showed up to give their inputs and suggestions on how the association should be ran. The racers that attended that meeting agreed that it should be ran off of IHRA's rulebook so all classes could race. Since NHRA didn't allow crate motors and such. This class racing association, known as the Carolina Class Racers Association was born that day. The association was formed to give legal Stock and Super Stock racers an alternative place to race without the high cost and to keep class racing alive and not to have to worry about bracket racing. We have all built cars or bought cars to class race with, why would we want to dilute that by allowing bracket racing rules?
I would like to see, as well others that have expressed to me, the CCRA grow large enough that we could have class run offs, heads up runs and to have a tech person on sight at every race. We are not at that point yet, but we are a growing association that is getting new members and racers every year. The CCRA is doing this by keeping the integrity of class racing alive. Please PM me or call me if you have any concerns and lets keep the CCRA class racer page friendly and upbeat. There are potential sponsors out there and the last thing we want to do is set the example of an association that is in disaray. We are not that type association and the CCRA racers are a "class" act, Thank You Scott Tilley superstock9327@yahoo.com 919-291-4355 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 637
Likes: 27
Liked 254 Times in 78 Posts
|
![]()
I would not like to see double entries by a single drive. I do not object to running the SS guys, though I believe they have some advantage over the footbrake guys because of the transbrake. This can hold up the show waiting on the driver from an earlier round.
In addition, since one of the cars is not a 'points' car, it has the ability to put a points earning car out, acting as sort of a spoiler. Don't like that either. The only way to consider this is might be to split stock and super stock until the later rounds, say quarter or semi finals. That makes setting up the show to complicated, so I think that is really not an option. I think if you have two cars, and want to run both, get a second driver. My 2 cents. Mike Moller
__________________
Mike Moller NHRA 203 Q-R-T/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Youngsville, N.C.
Posts: 624
Likes: 288
Liked 410 Times in 114 Posts
|
![]()
I agree with Moller, Scott, and Danny. Leave things as they are.
__________________
Joe Huestis "Annie's Song" Racing U/SA 2724 Youngsville, NC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|