|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
The longer the rod, doesn't the piston stay at TDC longer, therefore slowing piston speed down? Why do a lot engine builders say that long rods won't work for a short stroke engine? I've been curious about this for awhile. Thanks
Scott Tilley IHRA SS/PDA2 |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I think that a lot of the short stroke engines run a low deck block thus negating some some of the benefits of a long rod since you can only run so short of a compression height. But I did freshen an engine not to long ago that had a three inch stroke and 6.2 in rods in a standard block that was at the top of its class, made for some real light pistons.But there is just as many opinions as there are engine builders.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
You are both correct: a longer rod makes for a slightly lower piston speed.
Let's look at a 454BBC at 6500rpm. With the stock 6.135" rod, the peak piston speed is 7162.2 ft/min. If you go to a 6.385" rod, the piston slows slightly to 7135.4 ft/min. If you cram a 6.535" rod in there, you'll get the peak piston speed down to 7140.5 ft/min. That's less than a 1% difference.
__________________
~Pete 1970 Nova |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|