|
![]() |
#31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 100th Meridian
Posts: 570
Likes: 116
Liked 280 Times in 139 Posts
|
![]()
The 287 manifold would be considered "flat"compared to a 68-69 396/325 (shown).There not as restrictive as you may think,as the 71' 454/365 Chevelles and Corvettes use it,with 50+ more ci.and the same cyl. head (#820). gsa612
Last edited by gsa612; 06-23-2015 at 11:57 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 54
Liked 726 Times in 177 Posts
|
![]()
This is flat : '72 up manifold.
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 100th Meridian
Posts: 570
Likes: 116
Liked 280 Times in 139 Posts
|
![]()
In '72 it gets screwed up,you have to run that ^^ flat intake (#753),and head #'s 241 or 292. In '71 you have to run the 287 manifold (semi-flat lol..) with a choice of head #'s 820,241,292, with the 820 being the best.Both years are factored at 315 hp. I can't see why the '72 can't also run the 820 casting along with the other two. If anything the 72 combo should allow the 820 head and drop 10 hp to 305 in rating because of the lower more restrictive intake.Then you might have something,as all other components (cam lift,pistons etc.) are the same. gsa612
Last edited by gsa612; 06-23-2015 at 08:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 7
Liked 13 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|