worst red light debate, again!

[John Lang]

Who started this CRAP, and woke up these guys with there never ending first or worst CRAP! IT IS WHAT IS!!!! Get over it, and What Mike said X2.......Later, John

[John Kelley]

Originally Posted by Mike Carr

The thing that bothers the majority of us, is the fact that you and a few others bring this old subject up time and time again. We're just sick of reading it. .

You haven't figured out that you DO NOT have to read it if you don't like reading it ?
You have the choice of NOT reading it !!

[Ed Fernandez]

Thank you John.That's the answer.Let's let Bill make another post and we'll just not come back here on this thread.Presto,no more wasted time.Thanks John.Anybody who answers his post is an official Class Racer Horses *****.

[Hagen Gary]

Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez

Thank you John.That's the answer.Let's let Bill make another post and we'll just not come back here on this thread.Presto,no more wasted time.Thanks John.Anybody who answers his post is an official Class Racer Horses *****.

Ohhh, let me hurry up and get my post in.

I'm on both sides of this. Slow car in SS (for div 4 anyway), Fast car in Stock and I like the rule the way it is. As someone already pointed out, I like to have a clean tree. There is an advantage to that. Especially if you’re a blinder racer. If you take away my green light coming on, you also take away my ability to more accurately estimate my RT by when the green comes on. Is that good enough Mr. Bill?

[Toby Lang]

Originally Posted by Hagen Gary

If you take away my green light coming on, you also take away my ability to more accurately estimate my RT by when the green comes on. Is that good enough Mr. Bill?

This is the first time I've ever heard of anybody doing that, but it's my understanding that the green light will come on until both cars have left the line.


-Toby

[Ed Wright]

It ain't gonna change by posting endless crap here. Talk to NHRA.

[Toby Lang]

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

Makes no difference. Not going to change. Don't like it? Build a faster car or quit. Whining on a message board won't do a thing.
This is lame.

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

Does not matter. It's not going to change. Get over it or go do something else. Debating it won't change a thing. Go debate with the people that make the rules: NHRA. The people here have nothing to say about it. Makes no difference what anybody here thinks. Just does not matter what is said here. Get it?

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

Bill, approaching NHRA as I mentioned and whining on an Internet message board are two different things. Going on & on about it here does nothing. More people wanted cars weighed with the drivers than want this changed. Remember the poll done here? Most racers do not want or care about this. Get over it. Not going to happen. I would like to take long showers with Pamela Anderson too. That ain't gonna happen either.

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

Doesn't matter what you or I think Bill, it ain't gonna change because a small group complains about it here. Talk to N & I HRA. No leverage here. Surely your bright enough to get that. Ten (or fewer) guys on an Internet message board is not going to change that.

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

Doesn't matter, ain't gonna happen, but:
It (among other things here) has been discussed, and laughed about, in the staging lanes while killing time waiting for the endless line of throttle stop engines-on-a-stick cars run ahead of us. The slow cars that might be in favor are in the minority. You have not seen any polls here, or anywhere else, with my name on it.

Isn't there a bracket racing section here?

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

In the end, Bill's ( or anybody else's) long-azzed rants do not matter. It won't change.

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

What a radical idea! Petition NHRA instead of ranting endlessly on an internet message board! WOW!!

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

As I have stated many times before: I don't care either way. Read that again. I said petition NHRA instead of ranting here. Here = nothing. NHRA = maybe. That is how hp factors get reduced, not by endless message board rants.

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

If they change it, just make it right by putting both the red light cars out.
It won't get changed here.

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

It ain't gonna change by posting endless crap here. Talk to NHRA.

Hey, Ed, why don't you quit spamming this thread? We get the picture. How many times are you going to post the same thing over and over again?

Please put this thread in your ignore list or when you see a new post to this thread don't click on it, OK?


-Toby

[7423]

Toby, that was just freakin' awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LMAO OMG!!! Just perfect!!

[Casey Miles]

Toby: Now that was funny! Great.

Casey Miles
248H Stock?

[Hagen Gary]

Originally Posted by Toby Lang

This is the first time I've ever heard of anybody doing that, but it's my understanding that the green light will come on until both cars have left the line.


-Toby

That’s what I'm saying. If the green lights don't come on until the faster car leaves the line, then the faster car has a better judgment of where he's at on the tree. I know it sounds a bit funny, but I can tell if I was closer to .000 or .040 by when the green light starts to come on as I pass the tree. Two totally different spots in my window. Take that away and you take away that advantage from the slower car and give it to the faster one. Hope I didn’t give away any secrets, we all know you guys don’t need any more help. I'm just wondering if Mr. Bill considers this one reason against changing the rule or not.