HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2019, 02:14 PM   #11
Aubrey N Bruneau
Member
 
Aubrey N Bruneau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Eastern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 311
Likes: 6
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Aubrey N Bruneau
Default Re: Mounting weight in car?

HHMMM...
I realize that I know almost nothing... but
but
SOMEBODY has to ask this
! ! !
Why the dedication to making the car so much heavier ? ? ?
How I see it
A station wagon, by it's very design, already has a weight transfer advantage.
Obviously, the lighter car is faster.
The lighter car is easier on chassis parts... and even the body, if the intended added weight isn't in the form of structural improvement.

Why not go up a class ?
Besides, faster is funner !

just say'n
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S
62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409
Aubrey N Bruneau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2019, 02:33 PM   #12
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,453
Likes: 2,623
Liked 4,523 Times in 1,716 Posts
Default Re: Mounting weight in car?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aubrey N Bruneau View Post
HHMMM...
I realize that I know almost nothing... but
but
SOMEBODY has to ask this
! ! !
Why the dedication to making the car so much heavier ? ? ?
How I see it
A station wagon, by it's very design, already has a weight transfer advantage.
Obviously, the lighter car is faster.
The lighter car is easier on chassis parts... and even the body, if the intended added weight isn't in the form of structural improvement.

Why not go up a class ?
Besides, faster is funner !

just say'n
Good question. Now here's the answer :

First of all , a lot of racers don't pay any attention to the lower Stock classes. They do indeed ,think faster is funner ( and much more expensive..MY) Also ,they're convinced they can't win much , without being a chaser, running in the 10's. However, the fact remains, you have to hit the tree and run close, if you ever want to win anything, without relying on luck.

Okay..On to the answer.

T/SA index ,14.40 @19 lbs. per.

U/SA index , 14.85 @ 20 per.
Difference , .45 seconds.

At 204 hp, to go from 19 to 20 lbs. per, that is the amount of weight you would add.

You can probably extrapolate it from there.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2019, 02:50 PM   #13
Jeff Stout
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 54
Liked 673 Times in 265 Posts
Default Re: Mounting weight in car?

To run T I need to be 4103 lb.
To run U I need to be 4310 lb
Currently the car with driver and 3 gallons of gas is 3880 lb.
Yes a wagon will have good weight transfer but I need to meet minimum weight to fit in class. With the extra weight in the rear it will really transfer.
Jeff Stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2019, 03:26 PM   #14
Aubrey N Bruneau
Member
 
Aubrey N Bruneau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Eastern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 311
Likes: 6
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Aubrey N Bruneau
Default Re: Mounting weight in car?

Ah yes, I didn't realize that about T / U .
Makes sense now.
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S
62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409
Aubrey N Bruneau is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.