|
02-13-2022, 02:00 PM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 155
Likes: 18
Liked 129 Times in 51 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
Quote:
When they changed the rule to be allowed people to move up one class in addition to move to down a class I can't help feel that some good cars got a little bit hurt by new combo's previously not allowed to battle in that class . But lots of people maybe like this to be an "few combos field" in the end...
__________________
Stop global whining |
|
02-13-2022, 02:05 PM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 92
Likes: 1
Liked 17 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
Great post Charlie. I'm not racing anymore but I know that would have made my life a lot easier and enjoyable!
__________________
Sam Hamod 3456 STK |
Liked |
02-13-2022, 03:04 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 759
Likes: 16
Liked 625 Times in 86 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
Mr or Miss Race Clean that is about the weakest /vaguest argument for needing shipping weight so far. Basically your saying Please don't run my class it not far, that you have worked on improving your car and lighting it up over the years. My combo should only be allowed to run at the top of the class.
Could you give all of us an example of this. I'm pretty sure that most classes have 3-4 combos in each class that run a the top of the pack. with the exception to classes with slower then 13 second indexes just because of lack of car count in those classes Also please try and use you real name (this goes for everyone with an option on this for or against). This is a going to be a real issue with STK and SS if this shipping deal is not handled in a way that is best for the class and its ability to keep current and new racers coming back to a sport we all care about.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK |
Liked |
02-13-2022, 03:19 PM | #14 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 3,132
Liked 6,840 Times in 1,535 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
Just two questions to go with this "eliminate the shipping weights thing;
Will the Tech guys be checking for ballast? And will they be tossing cars out that are carrying over 500 lbs.? It's a "General Regulation". How long will it be before the Racers that want to do away with shipping weights are wanting fiberglass and carbon fiber parts so that they can lighten up their combos and making it "fair" to their heavy combos that can't compete with the light combos? If this passes, it WILL be the beginning of "E.T. 2 to the lanes"!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS Reality, what a concept! |
Liked |
02-13-2022, 03:33 PM | #15 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 1,408
Liked 373 Times in 80 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
Just drop the 170 rule.
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA 2010-2012 National Record Holder |
02-13-2022, 03:46 PM | #16 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 71
Liked 521 Times in 84 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
Quote:
Charlie, at this point seeing how NHRA has and will most certainly continue to handle the situation moving forward, I believe that you are on the right path, in all seriousness. The following should be put in place for 2023 season. 1. Get rid of ALL shipping weights...if you can fit between the max and min for the class your in! 2. Get rid of all 1/2 lbs weight breaks and make ALL classes 1# weight breaks. More cars per class, more chances of heads ups and less classes to manage for NHRA. Perhaps this might entice manufacturers to come back to sponsor class runoffs? If not, at least it will minimize the mathematics for all involved. 3. Combine stick and auto. Automatic transmissions and convertor technology has come along ways in the last two decades. This again would streamline our classes and allow for more heads ups and less for NHRA to manage. It seems to be working in the FS, FSS and FGT classes. If we are going to use forward thinking to resolve issues within the organization, then mean it...LOOK FORWARD!!! not just in the now. Rip this whole deal off like a Band-Aid, give everyone this season to make the necessary adjustments and there will be no more arguments...well other than AHFS but that's another thread! LOL
__________________
Kevin Gaffney 1123 SS/GA |
|
Liked |
02-13-2022, 03:50 PM | #17 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1,724
Liked 1,744 Times in 423 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
There has to be a maximum weight for every combination to keep racers from doing silly things....
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
Liked |
02-13-2022, 04:20 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 696
Likes: 284
Liked 242 Times in 94 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
|
Liked |
02-13-2022, 04:23 PM | #19 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greencastle pa
Posts: 198
Likes: 52
Liked 286 Times in 55 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
Quote:
__________________
Herbie Null 201 SS Last edited by Herbie Null; 02-13-2022 at 05:00 PM. |
|
Liked |
02-13-2022, 05:12 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 759
Likes: 16
Liked 625 Times in 86 Posts
|
Re: Shipping weights
Billy its not 1975 anymore. Eliminating shipping weights is way different then asking for carbon fiber hoods and doors. I agree let tech get hard on a ballast max weight, make sure that racers are following the 100 total lbs weight box rule. Just enforce the current weight rules. But at the end of the day its has to be easier in NHRA and the racer for this class to make it. The days of 15 plus NHRA tech guys that an event know the STK/SS rules front and back are over and never coming back.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK |
Liked |
|
|