|
03-23-2023, 09:00 PM | #21 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,664
Likes: 2,173
Liked 2,158 Times in 787 Posts
|
Re: I need to apologize!!
That Camaro is the fastest Gen 1 Camaro on the freak'n planet.
|
Liked |
03-23-2023, 09:25 PM | #22 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 228
Likes: 14
Liked 186 Times in 63 Posts
|
Re: I need to apologize!!
Quote:
|
|
Liked |
03-23-2023, 10:04 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Ann New York State
Posts: 126
Likes: 746
Liked 332 Times in 59 Posts
|
Re: I need to apologize!!
bubski thanks for the compliments!! Know take a deep breath and loosen your undies. It will get better for you,,I even think there's meds for you and another New Yorker. I see you are highly educated and I'm no match for a intelligent person like you and another New Yorker. Lol,,,CHEERS!!!
|
Liked |
03-24-2023, 08:53 AM | #24 |
Sponsor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Churchville, NY
Posts: 485
Likes: 110
Liked 965 Times in 63 Posts
|
Re: I need to apologize!!
Whats done is done. Not throwing rocks, we just need to be smart when possible given the cards we're dealt. Its really pretty simple, run fast when its dictated, but run 70 to 80 under when circumstances allow. I'll help with extrapolating your runs if you want, and I'm not not being a wise *** when I say that.
If one gets a first round single, put a 75 under run in the data base not a non-counting 58. If one red lights second round don't hold it wide open and go 90 under. With that said, its a free country and its your car. |
03-24-2023, 09:32 AM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 3
Liked 80 Times in 29 Posts
|
You set it up and drove and the car did what you asked.
Rather than cloak, please explain why accurately factoring a vehicle based on true performance capability isn't appropriate and not the best course of action?
The sanctioning body doesn't give a rodentias patoot with regard to who sets the standard for performance in any given class or what that standard may be. Fellow competitors face the impact of this masking and ultimate inaccuracy. Sounds as though the prudent endeavor is to eliminate the attempt at correction and the system designed and implemented to do so. The sanctioning body will have no qualm or trepidation if the competitors choose in this manner. Accuracy and accountability are demanded with regard to inspection but disregarded as it relates to actual performance. From this point, let them fly. Bubski may be the salient one in these discussions. |
Liked |
03-24-2023, 09:37 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Jersey
Posts: 181
Likes: 171
Liked 752 Times in 146 Posts
|
Re: I need to apologize!!
It seems like a lot of the problems we've seen in stock as far as rule bending really became amplified when the majority of racers decided to just go out and "buy horsepower" from select engine builder. Most not even batting an eye on how that extra horsepower was made. Unfortunately, it has evolved into a game of who can hide their "enhancements" the best. What seems to be true for most combos, is that if you build an engine exactly as the rulebook states, you aren't going to be anywhere close to those that spent the money to have a really fast bullet built. While it's easy to blame the NHRA for everything, I can't help but think us racers share a deal of fault for allowing stock to get to this point. It seems like NHRA has made up their mind as far as policing these enhancements, so as far as I'm concerned, building an engine to uphold the "integrity" of stock eliminator, is sort of a waste of time if you really want to have a chance in a heads up situation. I've yet to see a trophy for "most stock" car. Personally, I like to stick with the "built, not bought" program, but if I wasn't a broke college student, maybe that'd be different.
__________________
1189 F/SA Defunzalo Racing Enterprises |
03-24-2023, 10:15 AM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 3
Liked 80 Times in 29 Posts
|
"Rule bending" is a euphemism.
"Hide their enhancements"... from whom? The sanctioning body hasn't made up its mind on anything. The act or react to what is requested of them. At the administrative level, there is no concern whether vehicles in a specific class perform at the 9.50 or 11.50 level provided the mandated safety equipment is in place. These individual performance standards are exclusively germinated at the competitor level. The sanctioning body shoulders no blame. The racers are solely responsible for the subterfuge that corrupts this category. The lack of rectitude has no impact on the group sanctioning the events. The people directly affected by shunned veracity are those that help you push when you need it or pitch in when you require assistance or back out of the beam to wait while you deal with issues. |
03-24-2023, 10:51 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Monroe, La.
Posts: 301
Likes: 9
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: I need to apologize!!
As Dan says whats done is done. We all make mistakes. I have run this combo since the '90's when almost everyone was faster in a heads up run.It was fun while it lasted so if we return to those times, we will survive and play the ladder game again. No changes here. It's still fun to race.I still like racing a '69 and I like the way it looks.
__________________
Richard Grant 4988 STK |
03-24-2023, 11:11 AM | #29 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 3
Liked 80 Times in 29 Posts
|
Suggestions that illustrate the core issue
Quote:
The suggestions posited are at the core of the self-inflicted trauma that permeates this category. Whether attributed to content or approbation, observe how many are in agreement and the reality of creating and implementing an effective system is insuperably difficult, if not out of reach. Last edited by Paradigm Shift; 03-24-2023 at 11:53 AM. |
|
03-24-2023, 11:53 AM | #30 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 368
Likes: 95
Liked 379 Times in 72 Posts
|
Re: I need to apologize!!
Quote:
There was never a system in place until the AHFS. Like it or not, it took the arbitrary "you went fast the last two races and your combo is in National Dragster getting 5 - 15 hp in the next issue. What we are really missing is people looking at cars. I may be one to ask for it but when i can practically order lunch for who is tearing down next to me in the barn at Indy, we are not checking randomly. It was clear to me from the get go that .70 under runs are gold and you need as many of them under your belt as you can get. |
|
|
|