|
10-28-2015, 09:26 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 636
Likes: 76
Liked 306 Times in 114 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
Update: I ran the car at Bandimere in some 8800 DA conditions, 24.24 baro. I was able to figure out the off idle stumble and was able to run a 1.47 60, 6.95 660, 11.05 1320 on Sunday, If I could have figured out the carb Saturday when the baro was a whole 24.38 and had my 29.5s on there surely I would have seen some 10s.
|
11-03-2015, 08:00 PM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
HP how would it have compared if you ran the next bigger cam 238/248 114?
|
11-03-2015, 11:44 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 636
Likes: 76
Liked 306 Times in 114 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
|
04-03-2016, 12:03 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 636
Likes: 76
Liked 306 Times in 114 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
Update,
I had the peanut port out this weekend at Pueblo, 25.10 baro, 7000 DA, made suspension adjustments, along with 29.5 Hoosiers and ran the following 60 1.42 330 4.35 660 6.82 660 98.8 1320 10.86 1320 120.4 |
08-03-2016, 06:22 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 214
Likes: 3
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
I'm really impressed your horsepower and weight make that seem like a 11.20 combo not a high to mid 10 second combo. someone knows how to build a efficient car that works. nice job
|
08-04-2016, 08:39 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wingdale, NY
Posts: 302
Likes: 27
Liked 54 Times in 16 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
Great runs. Pretty impressive.
Have you ever done any work with the 366 truck motor? I know it is a high deck block, but we noticed it has smaller Main Journal size 2.50 like a 409 motor. Does anybody know if this motor listed in the NHRA guide? Probaly not since it only came in dump truck/buses. Will |
08-04-2016, 03:01 PM | #27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
HP is this the same engine combo with no changes as last year? Also if you had to make changes would you use a cam with a tighter lobe sep. ? What icl is the present one in at?What if you wanted to make more upper hp but not kill the bottom to increase the back half.Seems like you are running as fast as some alum. head roller cam more comp. engines.How about some thoughts on this.Most builders would cringe at a 114 ls.
|
08-05-2016, 08:25 AM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 636
Likes: 76
Liked 306 Times in 114 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
Quote:
It is the same combination as last year, just dialed in now, low 10s. The cam was used to keep the engine as close to what I sell as possible, the cam has great vacuum and works great in a street driver. There is better cam choices when it comes to the track for sure. I feel I've maxed the combo out and its time to move on to my 620 HP oval port combo, I think you will like that cam, 108 LC, peaks @ 6600 RPM, the peanut port peaked @ 5900, although it ran through @ 6900 RPM. Stay tuned.... Last edited by HP HUNTER; 08-05-2016 at 08:34 AM. |
|
08-05-2016, 09:12 AM | #29 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
It ran 10.80s at 7000 da is this corrected or what would you expect at 2000 da
|
08-05-2016, 09:50 AM | #30 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 201
Liked 118 Times in 50 Posts
|
Re: Peanut Port Drag Test
Quote:
About all we have ever done besides build them back stock, is use the cranks,in 396,427's and use the rods for stock rebuilds. 366 wouldn't be good for any kind of budget build,by the time you had custom pistons made that would be more than the difference in $ of 454/427 block,could build bigger for same or less money. HP,I like your build. Mike Taylor 3601 Last edited by Mike Taylor 3601; 08-05-2016 at 09:52 AM. |
|
|
|