HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2021, 07:17 AM   #21
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

What wheel offset do I need to properly fit a 15x10 with a 9x30 radial in the rear? I'm looking at some of the black versions of the RC Components "Fusion" wheels...
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2021, 10:56 AM   #22
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 1,078
Liked 181 Times in 111 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6130 View Post
Dan, the sedans are J/K/L cars, and the wagons are K/L/M cars. I'm not interested in running a sedan as an SS.

14.95 is WAY off the index(es).

The others are telling me to dump the 4L60E.

What do you mean by a "Truck case"? Are you talking about the differential case? I'd be running a spool.

It's been about 25 years since I was underneath one of these things- they use the same triangulated 4-link that GM used in all their other mid and full sized cars for 30 years or so, right?

I think the stock rules allow relocating one of the mounting points on those to move the instant center of the rear suspension to improve the geometry.

You use an OEM SS rear sway bar and TWO airbags? I thought I remember people only using one air bag back then. Are there better rear sway bars available so that I can get away without having to run any airbags? I can tune a sway bar like that with washers.

What about headers? I See that Hooker makes ceramic-coated headers with 1-3/4" primaries that sweep up and over, into a 3" collector.

In any case, thanks for your input.
The Caprice Sedan can run J.
The SS can only make K.
The wagon is a natural N car..can go M.

As for my wagon. It is set up for towing the SS.
FI grins bracket raced it ina hot day and Rand 14.95 that evening.
All stock engine with 3.73 for towing.

The Tahoe and truck came with thicker 4L60E cases.
Also a 6 quart oil pan. Which I have on my SS.

Mine has a Yank 4400PT Locking converter.
Mine is still licensed and can take for a car wash.

Have a choice to Lock up or use OD without screaming the engine.
However limited to 4700rpm stall on a 10 inch converter.
8 inch can go where you want with 5% top end slip.
Just turn off the Files to prevent Lock up feature up.
Using TunerCat and ODB1 tuning.

When you go under the car to see the chassis.
It will be familiar and 96 was last use of that chassis series.
It was introduced in 1964 for the Intermediates.
Then late 70’s 90’s Impalas. Rebodied 91 to 96’s

As for airbags.
You can get away with one on the right side.
Having good luck with both and can adjust the hit.

For cams big choices. Talk to Bullet cams.
NHRA standardized on the F-Body cam specs.
Do not know why.
If we had to use the B-body cam would put us N or below.
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2021, 11:01 AM   #23
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 1,078
Liked 181 Times in 111 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6130 View Post
What wheel offset do I need to properly fit a 15x10 with a 9x30 radial in the rear? I'm looking at some of the black versions of the RC Components "Fusion" wheels...
The SS and Caprice came with 2 axle lengths.
SS are a few mm longer.
No problem fitting 30x9 slicks.
I have rare Centerlines wheels with 3.5 backspacing.
Wagons have even longer axle.

I do have a complete 8.5 rear for sale.
4.56, Moser axles, ARP studs, mini spool.
disk brake to disk brake.
Have a PowerTrak in box.
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2021, 11:37 AM   #24
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

My bad- I was reading the wrong line when I scrolled right to see the pounds per horsepower.

It is in fact 14.87 pounds per horsepower for the '94-'96 Chevy and Buick LT1 B-wagons, making them natural N cars, which would save me the expense of a roll bar and 2-year driver's harness.

I'm gonna go back and edit my previous posts, to eliminate the incorrect information.

Last edited by 6130; 08-07-2021 at 02:45 PM.
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2021, 11:45 AM   #25
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

Okay, so the N/SA index is 13.00, and the record is currently 11.99 @108 or so. Sounds like I'm looking at about a 5.57 rear gear for starters...

Last edited by 6130; 08-07-2021 at 11:48 AM.
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2021, 03:16 PM   #26
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1,724
Liked 1,744 Times in 423 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6130 View Post
Sounds like I'm looking at about a 5.57 rear gear for starters...
I really doubt it would want that much. Maybe 5.13.
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 08-07-2021, 03:43 PM   #27
James Perrone
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 2,947
Liked 1,626 Times in 383 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

Billy Nees. I have one of these wagons in stock.
Hmmm. Winter project?
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK
James Perrone is online now   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 08-07-2021, 03:56 PM   #28
Jeff Stout
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 54
Liked 665 Times in 262 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

Az Classic car site on facebook has a 92 Chevy Wagon, running driving with lt1 for 2800. Car looks pretty good.
Jeff Stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2021, 04:13 PM   #29
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 1,078
Liked 181 Times in 111 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
I really doubt it would want that much. Maybe 5.13.
Put 5.13’s in my SS.
Running 28inch tire, locking converter at 98mph.
If I go with a 8inch converter will go to a 30 inch tire.
Turn off the lock up.

N/SA you will be close to 4500lbs.
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 08-07-2021, 04:27 PM   #30
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,433
Likes: 2,607
Liked 4,493 Times in 1,708 Posts
Default Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker

Sounds like you're doing your homework..That's good.
Just be careful who you listen to..This won't be a pure stocker.
OD trans planetaries and clutches and LU converters have no business in a good K/SA car. You'll leave too much ET on the table.
I think you already know that. ;-)
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.