1.28 - 60 ft

[1320racer]

another CLUELESS statement...

Maple Grove

Stick to peddling your lies and sales pitch to team clueless.

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

another CLUELESS statement...

Maple Grove

Stick to peddling your lies and sales pitch to team clueless.

I can see your upset, put about 3 tenths on your 522 first time down the track, with a production iron headed, production block, I think that about says it all. Bretts a pretty good guy.

[1320racer]

upset...hardly, just more of the same, clueless statements and lies. My 522 was never run wide open rather slowed to run 10.0x with the same restrictor plate I use now to run 9.0x.

and again, you never spoke to Bret who knows I ran a 1.288 and who has the timeslip from 11/24/07 @ 11:48am because he was in the other lane

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

just more of the same, clueless statements and lies. My 522 was never run wide open rather slowed to run 10.0x with the same restrictor plate I use now to run 9.0x.

and again, you never spoke to Bret who knows I ran a 1.288 and who has the timeslip from 11/24/07 @ 11:48am because he was in the other lane

Brett, do the right thing, come on here and clear this up. Any way you want to look at it, you,ve been out ran on the cars first full pass, hows that feel, bracket man? And then theres the two other chevelles out of my shop that gave you a beating.

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

upset...hardly, just more of the same, clueless statements and lies. My 522 was never run wide open rather slowed to run 10.0x with the same restrictor plate I use now to run 9.0x.

and again, you never spoke to Bret who knows I ran a 1.288 and who has the timeslip from 11/24/07 @ 11:48am because he was in the other lane

What was that weak 9.89 I saw with the front tires all over the place?// They looked like they were going to come out and hit someone in the head. I like your exhaust, LOL

[1320racer]

yes bret do the right thing and tell this clueless fool obsessed with a car that I sold 3 years ago, a car whose performance he clearly is impressed by that you were infact in the other lane on 11/24/07 @ 11:48AM. as the photo I posted days ago shows and you have the time slip showing my 60 foot as 1.288.

Meanwhile Mark since 2009, my car runs in the 8's and 60 foots 1 teens!

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

yes bret do the right thing and tell this clueless fool obsessed with a car that I sold 3 years ago, a car whose performance he clearly is impressed by that you were infact in the other lane on 11/24/07 @ 11:48AM. as the photo I posted days ago shows and you have the time slip showing my 60 foot as 1.288.

Meanwhile since 2009, my car runs in the 8's and 60 foots 1 teens!

Lets get this strait Ed, Brett never said you didnt run a 1.28, he said he didnt remember, but he did say he will have the time slip, and when he finds it he would call me, well that was two days ago, I made it very clear to him what my intentions were with your time slip. He also said the 60 foot clocks were fast at Piedmont (Suprise Surprise) he then said and I quote, (Eds getting under your skin isnt he). You have just talked so much trash on the internet over the years its just been shall I say, extra rewarding handing your _ _ _ to you. But your a great bracket racer, LOL. Hoping one day you will come out and race heads up 10 inch tire NA racing with us, (like thats going to happen) BTW my two strait championships as a machinist and engine builder, oh and both ends of the record for two years. You wait till I get ahold of Joe!

[1320racer]

bret knows better, the 60 foot clocks were not fast at Piedmont no more than they are fast at Atco where I had run 1.29 60 foot several times, though you and the rest of team clueless would like to think so. The ET's were fast because the air was good and the track well prepared that day 5 years ago.

Meanwhile, the 60 foot clocks must be fast everywhere I run now because whether I'm running at a near sea level track or one whose elevation is 1000 feet above and whether I'm running in 1000' of air or 4000'+, whether I'm running in NJ, PA, DEL, MD, VA or NC, my time slips show 1 teen 60 foots and 9.0x passes.

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

yes bret do the right thing and tell this clueless fool obsessed with a car that I sold 3 years ago, a car whose performance he clearly is impressed by that you were infact in the other lane on 11/24/07 @ 11:48AM. as the photo I posted days ago shows and you have the time slip showing my 60 foot as 1.288.

Meanwhile Mark since 2009, my car runs in the 8's and 60 foots 1 teens!

What did the chevelle run at Atco with the oval port engine? 60 330 660 1320? Lets put it to rest

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

bret knows better, the 60 foot clocks were not fast at Piedmont no more than they are fast at Atco where I had run 1.29 60 foot several times, though you and the rest of team clueless would like to think so. The track was fast because the air was good and the track well prepared that day 5 years ago.

60 foot clocks must be fast everywhere I run now because whether I'm running at a near sea level track or one whose elevation is 1000 feet above, running in 1000' of air or 4000'+ my time slips show a 1 teen 60 foot and a 9.0x pass.

Come on Ed, shouldnt a 4 link SS/GT car run in the teens under a no rules 522 inch aftermarket engine? Frank Grossi 8.77 peanut port 454, flattop Q-jet, 1.19 60 foot, thats just what these cars do. Just saying.......