Lawsuit over cylinder heads

[Sean Cour]

Thanks for the Covid Quarantine entertainment. Continue, as I have a giant bowl of popcorn to inhale!

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Sean Cour

Thanks for the Covid Quarantine entertainment. Continue, as I have a giant bowl of popcorn to inhale!

Sean, I don't want to get any more threads closed, nor this one ;-)

[Gary Smith]

Originally Posted by Sean Cour

Thanks for the Covid Quarantine entertainment. Continue, as I have a giant bowl of popcorn to inhale!

You're a really sick man. But then again, Brian is your dad LOL!!!!!!

[Gary Smith]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

(That's all I'm going to say, because I don't race Super Stock)

No, even worse you race Stock Eliminator!!!

[bykr]

Originally Posted by SSDiv6

Too funny!

Anyone that has been in the Super Stock class world knows who John Gulius is because he has been building engines for a long time.

Call it what it is no matter the way you paint it: Gossip and trying to find details about the lawsuit and of course, a Google search will show the latest related to his business.
By the way, the filing of the lawsuit is indeed public information; the details are not unless you pay for access.

So anything you don't want talked about is gossip I guess. Get a clue, forums are for discussion, not just for those that "have all the facts"

[SSDiv6]

Originally Posted by bykr

So anything you don't want talked about is gossip I guess. Get a clue, forums are for discussion, not just for those that "have all the facts"

You just don't get it.
When you are not aware or don't know the facts, why even discuss it?
It becomes gossip.

Add your previous statement that NHRA rescinded the rule because some people "cried"?

Your posting gives many the impression that John builds illegal engines when the fact is his engines have undergone many teardowns throughout the years and set many records and always deemed legal. Let's not forget there are others that have been doing the same work on their cylinder heads with other makes and they are considered legal. Is there a bias?

By the way, I do not have any involvement in the lawsuit.

[Lenny5160]

A couple posters in this thread seem ridiculously sensitive to this post.

As a completely outside observer but one who follows most topics on the board pretty closely, I don't think anything actually posted by the OP is anything close to out of line.

Nobody is saying (that I see) the racers that had Gulius stuff or used similar mods are or were cheaters. The stuff was made illegal via rule change, there was a huge uproar, and NHRA reversed the rule change. If I had stuff that checked legal and was made illegal with a stroke of the pen, I'd complain or cry too. The OP said the same. That doesn't infer anything negative about the complainers, IMO.

Now there is a lawsuit that is likely related, and a post was made here. I don't think one needs to know every facet of a topic to make a post about it.

[nolongerracing]

Originally Posted by nhramnl

Yeah, sure. That's what I said...

So, you are saying that Gulius was doing port work before it was legal, doing chamber work before it was legal, gas porting pistons before it was legal because his customers wanted it? In your words, is that what you are saying?

[nhramnl]

Originally Posted by nolongerracing

So, you are saying that Gulius was doing port work before it was legal, doing chamber work before it was legal, gas porting pistons before it was legal because his customers wanted it? In your words, is that what you are saying?

And who are you, the Attorney General? I didn't SAY any of those things. You inferred them. What I ACTUALLY SAID was that it's a shame that, in a world where rule bending and breaking is accepted as the price of admission, it's a shame that a long-established leader in Super Stock engine building has to defend his work and career. And that's ALL I said.

[Paul Sarvas]

I didn't say I didn't say it, I said I didn't say I said it...








pS