|
![]() |
#41 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,207
Likes: 1,049
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Terry Bell |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Member
|
![]()
Hey Terry
Hows the weather down there. I'll be there during the christmas holidays, sure hope its warmer then its is here. BBRRRRRRRR in the 20s at night and only the mid 30s during the day. I guess I'll be running S/ST & H/R plus Brackets of course, at the famous MIR. ![]() Cal H/R 177X |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Morton, IL
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
For all of you that want to eliminate timers, how do you propose we slow our cars down then? Run the stop the entire length of the track or use a high gear stop? Sounds like a huge step backwards to me.
I will admit that I agree the class is terrible for the spectators. But I honestly don't care. Our classes support themselves. We pay for everything with our entry fees. I race for me, not for the spectators (all 10 of them). I will also admit that I enjoyed racing T/S much more than the super classes. But we soon found out that after the class was contested for a few years it got fast enough that it took more money than I was willing to spend and more crew help than I had available. It was very fun going fast and having spectators interested in your class. But that all comes with a price. So far I have not heard any ideas on changes that I think will make any difference on spectators. Unless we do a 5' wheel stand or run in the 6's, most people wont care to watch us. Just my opinion.
__________________
Ryan Koener S/G 310C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: most places
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
I can go 170 in S/G and I would still like to see throttle stops gone. Why spend $25000 on a motor when you can run 9.90 with a sub $10000 motor. Same pay out less expense, makes sense to me.
__________________
Billy Leber 1150 SS, 1050 SG, 1962 STK, 185 SC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Morton, IL
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I do see your point. But for those of us that already have the equipment to go 170 what are we supposed to do with it? Sell it for .50 on the dollar and by a smaller motor? I also think there are a number of racers (myself included) that like to go fast and don't want to slow down. I don't think it is near as exciting to go 140 as it is to go 170+. If I wanted to go slow I would be racing stock.
__________________
Ryan Koener S/G 310C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,155
Likes: 2,040
Liked 2,806 Times in 876 Posts
|
![]()
Ouch! You better hope Ed or a host of others don't accidentally wander into the the .90 section of the forum. Course it could be entertaining...Class Wars XXX
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Morton, IL
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Ok, maybe that wasn't fair after further review. But I think you all know what I was trying to say. I don't mean anything against stock, it's a fine class it's just not for me. My point was that I don't have any interest in racing a car that goes 140-145mph or less, which is what you would have if your car only ran 9.90 flat out.
__________________
Ryan Koener S/G 310C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See ?
back 1/2 ONLY and leave it alone. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
8.00,9.00&10.00 hmmmm sounds like NHRA UNLEASHED?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|