|
07-30-2009, 11:35 AM | #51 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
Even better, the 413/420 combo. I would love see either of these combo's in use. My question is do you have to run the tall deck block used for the early 383's or can you use the short deck. It would seem that the 4.25x3.38 bore stroke combo would be better for making power versus the early bore stroke combo(but I'm not an engine builder). Either way I would love to see either combo in use.
__________________
Adriel Paradise, Paradise Racing Team Driver/Crew Chief(at least my dad claims me to be) B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of Arkansas |
07-30-2009, 11:36 AM | #52 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
Fun, but it would be the heaviest GT/A car out there!
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
07-30-2009, 11:37 AM | #53 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hasbrouck Heights, NJ
Posts: 120
Likes: 1
Liked 47 Times in 9 Posts
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
|
07-30-2009, 11:39 AM | #54 |
Senior Member
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
Jeff,
Of course you would claim the 500 hp engine from the B-bodied car, not the 507 hp engine from the A-bodied car ... hemi, 4 speed in your AMC, that would be neat ..
__________________
Chuck Beach 3340 STK |
07-30-2009, 11:41 AM | #55 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hasbrouck Heights, NJ
Posts: 120
Likes: 1
Liked 47 Times in 9 Posts
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
|
07-30-2009, 12:00 PM | #56 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
Would it work in a Gremlin???? Going from the ridiculous to the absurd, here... LOL!!!
__________________
Bill |
07-30-2009, 12:02 PM | #57 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
Quote:
Jim R
__________________
Jim Rountree |
|
07-30-2009, 12:06 PM | #58 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
What would be the weight distribution on that combo......90% front/10% rear?
__________________
Jim Rountree |
07-30-2009, 12:10 PM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 696
Likes: 284
Liked 242 Times in 94 Posts
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
The carbs are typically 3258 and 3259 and flow on my bench 445 and 450 cfm. The 383 inline is a great SS engine. The 413 would be poor as it has the same heads and carbs. The 383 is a low block and will allow more hood clearance for a ram type mani, Paul.
|
07-30-2009, 12:12 PM | #60 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: A couple of Mopar "legality" questions...??
Quote:
Jim R
__________________
Jim Rountree |
|
|
|