|
12-02-2016, 09:56 AM | #61 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 3,337
Liked 7,198 Times in 1,610 Posts
|
Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
Paul, one thing that I have found about Chrysler Racers is that the "factory" books generally say what ever the Racers want them to say. When I go looking for the reality of it all, I go to the collectors and restorers. Cars worth hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars on the auction block aren't pieced together with a Racers hearsay.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm OK..........it's everybody else. |
12-02-2016, 03:53 PM | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 519
Likes: 362
Liked 205 Times in 73 Posts
|
Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
I told James to post on here about the car he wanted to build. Certain people have turned this post into something else. I think if someone new wants to get involved in class racing they should be encouraged not deluged with all the BS that this has turned into. I for one am thankful he is not a sheep and building another Camaro.
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects. Last edited by Rod Greene; 12-02-2016 at 03:57 PM. |
12-02-2016, 04:12 PM | #63 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 3,337
Liked 7,198 Times in 1,610 Posts
|
Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
and you're absolutely right. I would never want to discourage anyone building whatever it is that they want to build (especially a Stocker!). Good luck with your build Mr. Miller and have fun with it!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm OK..........it's everybody else. |
12-02-2016, 05:17 PM | #64 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 992
Liked 7,168 Times in 1,386 Posts
|
Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
Quote:
|
|
12-02-2016, 11:15 PM | #65 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 249
Likes: 2
Liked 19 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
Hey dog not sure what MR. D.C. is referring to? But fact is in 1966 MOTHER MOPAR had NO fresh air on anything, no books required!!! NONE!!! but they're out there.
__________________
Frank Bialas 1570 STK |
12-03-2016, 12:13 AM | #66 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 496
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
I can appreciate Mr. Nees appreciation for keeping Stock pure, but I think the horses knocked down the barn and burnt it to the ground. All the Edelbrock heads and whatever else that has been approved, but on the other hand I can sympathize with someone running an old combo like a MW Mopar and trying to find good old heads and crossram, or even worse aluminum body panels. I'm sure a lot of racers with other brands have the same problems.
We did get a bit off track from my original request for suggestions. I've talked to Paul Wong a bit and got some good advice from him and others. I'm not out to set records or whatever. I am having trouble throttling my engine builder back as his thing is Full Tilt Boogie Engines. I don't want to pour that much money into the project. Thanks for everyone's input and info. I didn't think I'd hardly get a post on here and the thread sort of had a life of it's own. I didn't know there were so many (less than 10 really, but that's still a lot for a 273 Mopar) people interested in this combo.
__________________
Mopar 2 Ya! |
12-03-2016, 12:32 AM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 36
Liked 50 Times in 35 Posts
|
Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
I'm pretty sure you're right about that, I can't remember seeing anything at that time. What car are they using the fresh air on? Very few models had scoops thru those years 62-69, only Max Wedge, Hemi or 440-6. 70 up there where a lot. Almost forgot, air grabber on the RR-Super Bee. How could they get that allowed? Ask the old guys, they know. That's why I like the Stockers, right off the show room look. Makes me feel like I'm back in those days again.
|
|
|