HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2014, 01:50 PM   #1
HR9121
Live Reporter
 
HR9121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 112
Liked 2,869 Times in 641 Posts
Default 94 mustang gt

Anyone have any insight into this combo for stock. Its for a friend who is interested in building one, is it a feasible combo and how expensive to build a decent motor? Appears to me to fall in O but I haven't seen any so that's not a good sign.
__________________
James Williamson
W200 J/SA
HR9121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 02:38 PM   #2
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: 94 mustang gt

There is at least 2 members here that run that combo.

It is basically a Fox Mustang 5.0 combo but with a slightly heavier shipping weight so the 94-95 can also fit into the P class.

So all the mods for 87-93 Mustangs with the 5.0 would apply. (same cam, heads, shortblock, etc if I recall correctly)
Might need to go to an aftermarket ECU, or use a plug-n-play system like a TWeecer that plugs into the factory wiring harness.

I am thinking of moving my 95 Mustang 5.0 Pure Stocker up to NHRA Stock with a trans change, a cam change and a spooled rear end as well as an approved EFI system on NHRA's approved product list.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT

Last edited by ALMACK; 10-02-2014 at 02:42 PM.
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2014, 10:06 AM   #3
87gt50
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Malm?, Sweden
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 94 mustang gt

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
There is at least 2 members here that run that combo.

It is basically a Fox Mustang 5.0 combo but with a slightly heavier shipping weight so the 94-95 can also fit into the P class.

So all the mods for 87-93 Mustangs with the 5.0 would apply. (same cam, heads, shortblock, etc if I recall correctly)
Might need to go to an aftermarket ECU, or use a plug-n-play system like a TWeecer that plugs into the factory wiring harness.

I am thinking of moving my 95 Mustang 5.0 Pure Stocker up to NHRA Stock with a trans change, a cam change and a spooled rear end as well as an approved EFI system on NHRA's approved product list.
Would the TwEECer be legal for NHRA? I had one, but since its not listed in the "approved" list, I sold it again...
87gt50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2014, 11:32 AM   #4
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: 94 mustang gt

Quote:
Originally Posted by 87gt50 View Post
Would the TwEECer be legal for NHRA? I had one, but since its not listed in the "approved" list, I sold it again...
I just took these screen shots off NHRA' s site for the approved EFI systems.
I don't see the Tweecer on the list.

For some reason I thought the Tweecer was allowed.



__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2014, 01:07 PM   #5
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
Default Re: 94 mustang gt

With the TWeecer system, you are retaining the OEM computer and not replacing.
The list is for systems that replaces the OEM computer.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 10-09-2014, 03:35 PM   #6
7423
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 94 mustang gt

A Tweecer adjusts the OEM computers parameters. Have used one for years. They work fair, the less you have it do, the better it functions. Holds up to 4 different tunes. Great for switching between pump gas and the high dollar legal stuff.
7423 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2014, 03:46 PM   #7
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: 94 mustang gt

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6 View Post
With the TWeecer system, you are retaining the OEM computer and not replacing.
The list is for systems that replaces the OEM computer.
Thanks for clarifying.
That makes more sense to me.
And I also forgot Charlie (7423) was using the Tweecer.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 02:38 PM   #8
Rich67stang
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jackson, NJ
Posts: 304
Likes: 2
Liked 84 Times in 20 Posts
Default Re: 94 mustang gt

That Combo should run -.500 with no problem, the upper intake is restrictive compared to 93 upper intake IMO. The body style is not very appealing to most Mustang enthusiasts IMO, fox bodies have a ton of R&D.
__________________
Richard Preiser
1613 FGT/I 1510 C/SA 161 F/DA
Rich67stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 02:47 PM   #9
HR9121
Live Reporter
 
HR9121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 112
Liked 2,869 Times in 641 Posts
Default Re: 94 mustang gt

Thanks alot guys, I had heard that about the intake as well didnt know how much it would effect the flow. Appreciate the info, Richard I am the one that you ran at Darlington with the green camaro hope you are doing good.
__________________
James Williamson
W200 J/SA
HR9121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 03:11 PM   #10
Bill Harris
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 420
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: 94 mustang gt

Alicia Anderson, Rusty Johnson's (much) better half runs this combo. Her car was Jeff Interlicchia's old car. I have driven the car and it is a fun ride. There is plenty of potential, it is pretty easy to work on and parts are plentiful.

Rusty monitors this site and you could send him a PM if you had questions about it.

Personally, I far prefer the '94-'98 Mustang body style to either the Fox or the '99-'04 models. Take a close look at Nick Morris's SSGT car sometime if you want a beautiful example of that body style. I particularly dislike the '99-'04 and I think they are the ugliest Mustang since the '71-'73, one of which I own and used to race . I also have an 85.5 Fox SVO which a lot of people also consider an ugly car, although they are full of crap.

http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story....=&aff=national
__________________
Bill Harris
ex 2172 STK
ex 2272 S/S
Bill Harris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.