HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2015, 10:59 PM   #21
Pvt Parts
Member
 
Pvt Parts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Avon, Indiana
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Merge collectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
I tested what Jere Stahl recommended. It was faster. Good enough for me.
Thanks.
I went the fastest in B/A and C/A with merge collectors from the same guy that was building them for Glidden. David ran them as well.
__________________
Scott Wilcox 2193 3x National Champion
SS/A, SS/B, SS/K, SS/L, SS/AM, A/SM, C/SM, B/A, C/A, G/A, H/A
Pvt Parts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 11:04 PM   #22
Alan Roehrich
VIP Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,904
Likes: 984
Liked 1,016 Times in 264 Posts
Default Re: Merge collectors

Much as I like and respect Jere, I'm not at all convinced his opinions on steps and merge collectors are completely correct.

In fact, when I pressed Jere a little further, he admitted that step headers were worth some power. Ours are one step, 2" to 2-1/8". They were in fact quicker and faster than the Hooker 2-1/8" headers. Even when the Hookers, which were too big and too short, had a set of Mark's merge collectors on them. Later, after some testing and data crunching, Jere and I discussed a set of two step headers, 1-7/8" to 2" to 2-1/8", and a set of merge collectors. Development on that combination stopped before they were built.

Jere's main thoughts on stepped headers, and merge collectors, were for the most part along the lines that few would ever do what was necessary to see what he told me he felt were possible 2-3% gains. As such, he felt for 95% of his customers they were not worth the extra money. The truth is, Jere is probably right. As Billy said, and I agree, for the vast majority of racers, a basic set of single diameter headers with regular collectors, properly sized, will be all they can ever use. They will never do the development necessary to take advantage of anything else.

Now, the flip side of that is that 3% on a 650HP engine is almost 20HP. Well worth the upcharge Jere was asking for two step (three diameter) 4 into 1 headers.

I spoke at length with Jere's head fabricator, who actually runs the new business, and makes genuine Jere Stahl pattern headers. He told me that he would not make single diameter headers anymore, they would at least be one step, for both performance and ease of fabrication. Odds are, my next set will be built there, and they will be two step, or three diameter headers. They will get a set of merge collectors.

I've also talked to Larry Meaux (mostly by email and private message), who developed the PipeMax software that many of us use. Larry said that even some of the most well funded racers, even after seeing what the right size and lengths of primaries and collectors did for their expensive race engines would not spend much more time and money testing cams, and especially not on merge collectors. Larry has in fact expressed the same thing Jere, Billy and I have said. Most racers either cannot or will not do what is necessary to make the higher end headers and collectors work, and will see no gains. Larry has spent a couple of decades on the dyno and the track learning about this stuff, and then writing software to quantify it.

I've spoken with Calvin Elston many times, He is a very sharp individual, and a great fabricator who makes a top shelf product. They are absolute automotive artwork, no doubt. That said, his headers are more than twice what Jere was getting for his, and few people would make the effort and spend the money to see the gains they potentially have. A set of 4-2-1 headers requires even more camshaft development than a set of step headers with merge collectors. Calvin quoted me over $3500 for a set 4-5 years ago, and I know it might take 3-4 cams to take full advantage of them. At a bare minimum, that's $1400-$1600 worth of cams, and 2-3 days ($1800) worth of dyno time. For the vast majority of racers, that's just plain out of reach, and out of the question.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2015, 12:53 PM   #23
RonP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Detroit,MI
Posts: 74
Likes: 25
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Smile Re: Merge collectors

I worked with/at Kromerkraft in the late 90's & early 00's. Everything we built in that era was merge collectors with the tower in the middle to make the flow path more streamlined, occasionally megaphone collectors. Our experience from customer to customer was maybe a max of 0.05 seconds improvement. Generally, 0.02 or 0.03 made for a happy customer. Sometimes what the car wants on the track is not exactly the same as what the dyno wants. One occasion, we had a Super Stock engine builder request two sets of headers, one with 2 steps and one with 3 steps. The dyno liked the 3 step and track liked the 2 step. My guess for the merge collectors is that won't hurt, but may not help. Generally, we found that each customer had to be treated individually for his particular setup.

Last edited by RonP; 10-05-2015 at 12:56 PM.
RonP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2015, 06:19 PM   #24
Fatman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: near Phialdelphia, PA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Merge collectors

What you'll see on the dyno data, if the headers are over scavenging, is the torque and hp numbers drop while the V/E numbers go up. inconsistent EGT's and BSFC numbers jumping. SS engines are to many different breeds to say if a merge is better, certainly not without the proper cam timing. The PS guys get away with them because their exhaust valves are so small and their ports are fast and efficient.
Frank.
Fatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2015, 08:24 PM   #25
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
Default Re: Merge collectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
Much as I like and respect Jere, I'm not at all convinced his opinions on steps and merge collectors are completely correct.

In fact, when I pressed Jere a little further, he admitted that step headers were worth some power. Ours are one step, 2" to 2-1/8". They were in fact quicker and faster than the Hooker 2-1/8" headers. Even when the Hookers, which were too big and too short, had a set of Mark's merge collectors on them. Later, after some testing and data crunching, Jere and I discussed a set of two step headers, 1-7/8" to 2" to 2-1/8", and a set of merge collectors. Development on that combination stopped before they were built.

Jere's main thoughts on stepped headers, and merge collectors, were for the most part along the lines that few would ever do what was necessary to see what he told me he felt were possible 2-3% gains. As such, he felt for 95% of his customers they were not worth the extra money. The truth is, Jere is probably right. As Billy said, and I agree, for the vast majority of racers, a basic set of single diameter headers with regular collectors, properly sized, will be all they can ever use. They will never do the development necessary to take advantage of anything else.

Now, the flip side of that is that 3% on a 650HP engine is almost 20HP. Well worth the upcharge Jere was asking for two step (three diameter) 4 into 1 headers.

I spoke at length with Jere's head fabricator, who actually runs the new business, and makes genuine Jere Stahl pattern headers. He told me that he would not make single diameter headers anymore, they would at least be one step, for both performance and ease of fabrication. Odds are, my next set will be built there, and they will be two step, or three diameter headers. They will get a set of merge collectors.

I've also talked to Larry Meaux (mostly by email and private message), who developed the PipeMax software that many of us use. Larry said that even some of the most well funded racers, even after seeing what the right size and lengths of primaries and collectors did for their expensive race engines would not spend much more time and money testing cams, and especially not on merge collectors. Larry has in fact expressed the same thing Jere, Billy and I have said. Most racers either cannot or will not do what is necessary to make the higher end headers and collectors work, and will see no gains. Larry has spent a couple of decades on the dyno and the track learning about this stuff, and then writing software to quantify it.

I've spoken with Calvin Elston many times, He is a very sharp individual, and a great fabricator who makes a top shelf product. They are absolute automotive artwork, no doubt. That said, his headers are more than twice what Jere was getting for his, and few people would make the effort and spend the money to see the gains they potentially have. A set of 4-2-1 headers requires even more camshaft development than a set of step headers with merge collectors. Calvin quoted me over $3500 for a set 4-5 years ago, and I know it might take 3-4 cams to take full advantage of them. At a bare minimum, that's $1400-$1600 worth of cams, and 2-3 days ($1800) worth of dyno time. For the vast majority of racers, that's just plain out of reach, and out of the question.
Jere told me mine might like a 2" step on mine.
No more int/ex split than my cam has ( 4 @ .050"), and I backed the ex lash way off, still nothing. Some run single pattern cams, or "reverse split" cams to make merge collectors work? My heads do have very good exhaust ports. Best I have seen for an SS LT1. I have seen, owned and flowed LT1 heads from a few shops. Was no huge difference between the two most popular. (Have not seen Gulius heads) I have tested all five of my cams. I have bigger & wider, smaller & closer, more split, and the one I keep going back to. Done fuel loops & timing loops on the dyno. So far found nothing. May just be too stinking dumb. Likely so.
Got two more races till I'm done anyway. Through looking for more. Trying to watch the average for the other guys these last two.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2015, 01:15 PM   #26
dmir55
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: northern Minnesota
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Merge collectors

We set a national record with a set of Hedman step headers on 302 ford. The pipes were 1 1/2 to 1 5/8 step. You can't use there collectors as they are no good for a race car. The collectors we used were made by Headers by ED of Minneapolis MN. He doesn't use a merge type of collector but uses his own style that seems to work just as well. And it is a lot easier to make. Ed no longer makes complete pieces, but has every thing you need to make your own. Now day there is a lot of satisfaction in doing your own stuff. Eds collectors when we finished them were 2 3/8 minor od 2 1/2 major od. One last thing. I talked at length with the late great Jack Davis of Hooker and Davis headers about design. Of all the information he shared with me, one thing he said was about testing. He felt headers had to be tested at the track not on a dyno. Hope this helps and happy motoring.
dmir55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 03:21 PM   #27
Exhausted
Junior Member
 
Exhausted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Merge collectors

A friend told me that this thread was getting some attention so I thought I might put in my 2 cents.

IMO, I have never seen a exhaust port that was smaller than it needed to be.
If you can change say header tube size or step length, or no-step to two step, or collector diameter or length or 421 to 4into1, and not see any difference your motor is not sensitive to what kind of a header it has on it. Another way of saying that is your header is not working to add anything to the way the engine runs, is it?

It is certainly possible that whether you buy headers that come in a box or made for you custom, if the above is the case, it is not simply the fault of the header, ok?

If you do not want to change things in the motor so you can gain the extra power available from the exhaust system, then keep bracket racing and praying you don't have to run heads up with someone who does.
__________________
Calvin Elston
Elston Exhaust Inc.
www.elstonheaders.com
Exhausted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 04:42 PM   #28
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 3,067
Liked 6,730 Times in 1,512 Posts
Default Re: Merge collectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exhausted View Post
It is certainly possible that whether you buy headers that come in a box or made for you custom, if the above is the case, it is not simply the fault of the header, ok?

If you do not want to change things in the motor so you can gain the extra power available from the exhaust system, then keep bracket racing and praying you don't have to run heads up with someone who does.
Although I won't disagree one bit with what you're saying, I think that you'll find that a good number(I won't say majority) of Stock and SS Racers today are buying an "engine package" because of the lack of time they have to test these days. I don't believe that they have gotten lazy or stupid. They have their stuff dynoed and put it in the car for lack of time. Now, more than ever, they're counting on us to have done the work.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

Make tech "TECH" again!
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 05:07 PM   #29
Exhausted
Junior Member
 
Exhausted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Merge collectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Although I won't disagree one bit with what you're saying, I think that you'll find that a good number(I won't say majority) of Stock and SS Racers today are buying an "engine package" because of the lack of time they have to test these days. I don't believe that they have gotten lazy or stupid. They have their stuff dynoed and put it in the car for lack of time. Now, more than ever, they're counting on us to have done the work.
Ya know your absolutely right.

Every once in a while I will get a spec on how a builder wants a header for his engine. All I have to do is ask a few questions and they will admit they really have no idea outside of their dyno header.

So I am asked to figure it out for him or "whatever" I think. So now I am responsible for making his engine run better. Seems most racers know there is something there but few answers...
__________________
Calvin Elston
Elston Exhaust Inc.
www.elstonheaders.com
Exhausted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 05:21 PM   #30
Alan Roehrich
VIP Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,904
Likes: 984
Liked 1,016 Times in 264 Posts
Default Re: Merge collectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Although I won't disagree one bit with what you're saying, I think that you'll find that a good number(I won't say majority) of Stock and SS Racers today are buying an "engine package" because of the lack of time they have to test these days. I don't believe that they have gotten lazy or stupid. They have their stuff dynoed and put it in the car for lack of time. Now, more than ever, they're counting on us to have done the work.
Yeah, Billy, I agree. Given the amount of time it takes to actually go racing on a reasonably regular basis, and the amount of money required, it is no surprise that so many of the people who actually can afford to race have little or no time to spend on testing. Most of them don't have the money, either.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.