|
10-07-2015, 11:13 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 13 Posts
|
Head gasket bore vs compression
How important is the bore size of the cylinder vs the bore size of the gasket? Say you have a 4.200 bore and a 4.400 gasket what would be the difference in compression if I went to a 4.250 gasket?
|
10-07-2015, 11:19 AM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 236 Times in 127 Posts
|
Re: Head gasket bore vs compression
There are a lot of variables in CR. Try putting the info you are playing with into a calculator like the one in the link below to see the differences.
http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html Dale
__________________
Dale Shearon 68 Mustang 6394 |
10-07-2015, 12:48 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 451
Likes: 210
Liked 141 Times in 63 Posts
|
Re: Head gasket bore vs compression
Gasket bore size doesn't change compression as much as you think, thickness does.
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
10-07-2015, 09:49 PM | #4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 236 Times in 127 Posts
|
Re: Head gasket bore vs compression
Considering an 0.040 gasket, the 4.4 would create a cylinder with a volume of 9.963cc while the 4.250 bore would give a cylinder of 9.291cc.
That's a 0.672cc difference. I don't think it matters a gnats eyelash. Dale
__________________
Dale Shearon 68 Mustang 6394 |
10-07-2015, 11:15 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Head gasket bore vs compression
Would a 3.5cc decrease by using a thinner/smaller bore gasket make much difference? .012" thinner, about .030 smaller bore if i remember correctly. Worth changing?
|
10-07-2015, 11:42 PM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 2,579
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
|
Re: Head gasket bore vs compression
Quote:
Worth changing? That depends on whether you consider this work...or fun.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers |
|
10-08-2015, 12:14 AM | #7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Head gasket bore vs compression
It's certainly a lot of both....but sometimes i wonder . Thanks
|
10-08-2015, 08:06 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Waldorf Md
Posts: 222
Likes: 10
Liked 26 Times in 15 Posts
|
Re: Head gasket bore vs compression
Quote:
You have to be careful with this. Depending on how much chamfer your machinist put on the tops of the bores you could start hanging the gasket into the chamfer area. I put very little chamfer on performance builds but some guys might put more. All it takes is 030" all the way around and you will be into the fire ring on a 4.250 gasket and that's assuming that all of the bore centers, dowel pin holes etc. are perfectly aligned with the gasket. 4.250 should be safe but its just something else you need to look at.
__________________
Bill Koustenis |
|
10-09-2015, 03:30 AM | #9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,528
Likes: 2,220
Liked 1,792 Times in 571 Posts
|
Re: Head gasket bore vs compression
I agree with Dale........Tiny change in compression for bore size variation.
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
|
|