|
10-27-2014, 08:49 PM | #21 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 326
Liked 280 Times in 150 Posts
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
Strange is about 20 miles from me- I know a lot of the guys in there---constantly working and developing new parts for Nascar-they have realized the continuous money potential of Nascar and stock car racing in general. Drag racing for the most part is a one time deal-- you buy some axles they never need to be replaced--buy a center section once in a while--- many companies sell ring & pinions so why would they want to invest in something like that??? Nascar on the other hand usually has "no budget" when it comes to replacement parts--- they replace stuff every weekend after every race and carry a boat load of spares too. I think they are weaning themselves off of drag racing and focusing more & more on "stock car" racing-- I've met Jeff on many occasions and he is not dumb he is following the money trail-Strange does not need NHRA it has a well known name and will survive without NHRA---NHRA on the other hand needs Strange as well as the other manufacturers to survive and keep revenue coming in-- my 2 cents on it FED 387
|
10-27-2014, 08:59 PM | #22 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 112
Liked 2,866 Times in 640 Posts
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
Quote:
__________________
James Williamson W200 J/SA |
|
10-27-2014, 09:14 PM | #23 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 105
Likes: 179
Liked 55 Times in 17 Posts
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
Quote:
Seems to me if you have enough money to pay NHRA you could have anything approved for use in any class. Bribery comes to mind here!
__________________
1967 Fairlane A/Stick - 1994 Mustang GT. 1989 Oldsmobile, R/SA - 2016 Z06 Weekend Street Car. |
|
10-27-2014, 11:17 PM | #24 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
This whole scenario reminds a conversation I had many years ago with Art Morrison. If many remember, he used to advertise a full page in ND and also pay contingency. NHRA changed the terms of contingency and advertising to the extent he had to stop doing so. It did not affect his business since he moved his business towards street rods.
|
10-28-2014, 09:16 AM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jackson, NJ
Posts: 304
Likes: 2
Liked 84 Times in 20 Posts
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
[QUOTE=
Seems to me if you have enough money to pay NHRA you could have anything approved for use in any class. Bribery comes to mind here![/QUOTE] And now we have Cobra Jets with Yates Heads running in stock...
__________________
Richard Preiser 1613 FGT/I 1510 C/SA 161 F/DA Last edited by Rich67stang; 10-28-2014 at 09:27 AM. |
10-28-2014, 09:48 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
I can see Jeff Strange's point. The NHRA makes Strange display an NHRA/Strange decal that doesn't benefit Strange from a product standpoint. Strange wants to see decals with the Strange name along with the product the racer bought and uses on his race car. Strange is just trying to optimize their advertising dollar. What is happening to them now is they are flushing their advertising dollar down the drain due to a lack of product exposure.
The NHRA needs to be careful. Race component suppliers can easily implement a private contingency program and cut them completly out of the loop.
__________________
Nelson Kowal Stock 345 |
10-28-2014, 10:30 AM | #27 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 53
Liked 655 Times in 255 Posts
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
If companies were to privatize contingency could NHRA make racers not display a decal on car ? I don't know. This came to mind when I was selling VP in Phoenix. I presented a bid to a local stock car association and did Sunoco. Sunoco won the bid and everyone had to run the Sunoco decal and could NOT run a VP decal on car or they wouldn't get paid. This happened on a local level but the racers went for it.
Last edited by Jeff Stout; 10-28-2014 at 10:55 AM. Reason: more |
10-28-2014, 10:53 AM | #28 | |
Member
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
Quote:
Try to run a Pepsi decal on you car and see what happens! Its in the rule book that you can't have a carbonated soft drink other then Coke.
__________________
Ross Gregory 5133 Stock,Super Stock 53 Top Dragster |
|
10-28-2014, 11:20 AM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 958
Likes: 618
Liked 165 Times in 60 Posts
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
Quote:
Good luck to Strange. First MW, and now Strange. Is Moser next? Most all cars going down the track have aftermarket axles, it just does not make sense to keep running sponsors off. But the ones making these decisions need to take a step back and look at the big picture. Sean
__________________
Sean Marconette 84 Mustang 5060 SS/N |
|
10-28-2014, 12:17 PM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Strange Engineering/NHRA dispute
Why don't manufactures just have you fill out a form when you purchase a product that you compete in Drag Racing give them the car # and screw the decal, do it private ? If NHRA won't let us run the decals because of that I'm more than happy to take all that crap off my car !
I don't think running a decal really makes a huge impact on the product we use when there are O Frign people in the stands when we race !!! But the fact is I spend my money on the product …...
__________________
Bob Aceves, 746 E/SA A&M motorsports |
|
|